ad hoc advisor to Cal HSR and experienced retired railroad worker..
]]>Then turning to the far less costly, 110mph~125mph mixed and dedicated Regional HSR in existing rail corridors (many of which have space for two or three additional lines) … declare that its not a big enough difference to do anything.
Of course, by treating each one as a one-size-fits-all system and then finding that one size does not fit all, they are just engaged in a straw man argument. For example, between New York and Chicago, just one 220mph corridor mostly through northern Ohio farmland that junctioned with the proposed Ohio Hub could with the addition of dedicated high speed track in the Ohio and Midwest Hubs, allow 220mph trains to directly serve (in addition to all the connections available via transfer to the Ohio Hub system itself):
Pittsburgh/New York via Ohio Hub Pittsburgh/Cleveland
Pittsburgh/Chicago via Ohio Hub Pittsburgh/Cleveland
Pittsburgh/Columbus/Chicago via Ohio Hub Pittsburgh/Columbus/Detroit
Cleveland/Chicago via Ohio Hub Cleveland/Columbus
Detroit/Cleveland/New York via Ohio Hub Pittsburgh/Cleveland/Detroit
Cincinnati/Columbus/New York via Ohio Hub Cleveland/Columbus/Cincinnati
Indianapolis/Columbus/New York via Ohio Hub Columbus/Indianapolis and Cleveland/Columbus
This is part of the success of the French HSR system – they run routes over the corridors then continue them on their interurban express rail network. We don’t have an interurban express rail network anymore … but the 110mph networks give us an opportunity to rebuild them.
]]>Then turning to the far less costly, 110mph~125mph mixed and dedicated Regional HSR in existing rail corridors (many of which have space for two or three additional lines) … declare that its not a big enough difference to do anything.
Of course, by treating each one as a one-size-fits-all system and then finding that one size does not fit all, they are just engaged in a straw man argument. For example, between New York and Chicago, just one 220mph corridor mostly through northern Ohio farmland that junctioned with the proposed Ohio Hub could with the addition of dedicated high speed track in the Ohio and Midwest Hubs, allow 220mph trains to directly serve (in addition to all the connections available via transfer to the Ohio Hub system itself):
Pittsburgh/New York via Ohio Hub Pittsburgh/Cleveland
Pittsburgh/Chicago via Ohio Hub Pittsburgh/Cleveland
Pittsburgh/Columbus/Chicago via Ohio Hub Pittsburgh/Columbus/Detroit
Cleveland/Chicago via Ohio Hub Cleveland/Columbus
Detroit/Cleveland/New York via Ohio Hub Pittsburgh/Cleveland/Detroit
Cincinnati/Columbus/New York via Ohio Hub Cleveland/Columbus/Cincinnati
Indianapolis/Columbus/New York via Ohio Hub Columbus/Indianapolis and Cleveland/Columbus
This is part of the success of the French HSR system – they run routes over the corridors then continue them on their interurban express rail network. We don’t have an interurban express rail network anymore … but the 110mph networks give us an opportunity to rebuild them.
]]>