http://thenewamerican.com/usnews/politics/8967-day-of-rage-wall-st-occupation-sparks-fears Who
lit the spark?
Notice the
Bircher’s first word in the article: Analysts.
Let me interpret that for you, Analysts = 1 % Think Tanks. If the
article was put to press on the 13th, how much time was required to
poll the ‘Analysts’? How early was this Alert made know to TJBS so it could be
researched? How long has this event been a strategy to polarize? It sounds more
like an outline of what is expected and not speculation. Find the ‘Analysts’
and you find the think tanks, the cells, the spark.
Why did the
Birchers have a Sept. 13 article on the OWS quoting “analysts”? Analysts = think tank. Who are the Birchers? Why, Fred C. Koch
(daddy) is! He was a 1%’r. The Koch Brothers are behind the TEA Party
too. OWS was out of the CFR press for a reason, they did not want to be too
eager to enjoy the brawl the 1% seeded.
Do you really think Palin is against the crony capitalists (she wants to
drill) or is it just a coincidence that not long after her casting them in her
mouth, OWS has Bircher analysts raising an eyebrow before anything happened? It
was all a cyber wag. Palin’s charge on the crony capitalists is not that old,
in fact, it merges with OWS sentiment quit perfectly. OWS is doing the bidding
of the Koch Brothers with all the conviction they can muster. The Koch Bros.
want chaos through dog wagging sedition. Now the CFR media is giving the movement the ink.
The Koch Bros.
are employing Learned Helplessness in their sedition. OWS has real people with
real issues just like the TEAs but there is a difference between the organic
grass roots growth and the genetically crafted seed it sprang from. The TEAs
were a national grass roots happening without the common person aware they
existed. The media had to educate and inform us of this group. There were LDS
member sites that were libertarians (and closet Birchers) that morphed an idea
into national organization via LDS and other denominations members and it grew
like a weed. It looked organic but it was not. The Libertarians got a face lift
and the coup on the right directed at the GOP was launched right after the
election. OWS does not serve the people
that support it, but it looks that way, This is pre-election controversy and it
serves a purpose for the 1% who grew the seed in a smoke filled room.
Nader was CFR in
the 70’s. He is as green as a dollar bill and a international compulsory carbon
tax.
Yes, but the point is he will probably not get the nomination because he is anti-establishment. Left-wing media doesnt give him attention because he could probably beat Obama, and right-wing media ignores him because he would cut critical ties within the military-industrial complex (among other things). He’s the godfather of the Tea Party and he gets more support from the Daily Show than Fox News. I would probably vote for him if he actually made it, but I dont think he can compete with Wall Street or Big Oil, no matter how unfair it is.
]]>I disagree. Ms. Gauding’s excellent, albeit it defeatist, analysis hinges on a false choice: Wall Street vs. Big Oil (restated later as Koch Brothers vs. Goldman Sachs). Dr. Paul is the only candidate that warned us of the toxic asset bubble years in advance, opposed the invasion/occupation of Iraq, and has fought consistently against violations of liberty like we have under Homeland Security and the PATRIOT Act.We are not against regulation so much as unconstitutional, perverse regulation.
]]>You said dismantling 700-800 US military bases would not be a bad thing. Dr. Paul is the only top tier candidate that is suggesting that we do that. He speaks for the people, not big money. He did perfect the money bomb, and he has raised almost half a million dollars *this morning* from small donations.
]]>Great questions! I don’t know if anyone has answers at the moment, and I don’t know if we are at the last phase. The last phase will be the dismantling of the 700-800 military bases we have around the world. (Not a bad thing.) Sort of like the Brits when their empire fell apart. But the decline has definitely started in so many areas. Just another example of impermanence.
]]>Ron Paul is a fantasy utopian — except what he thinks would be utopia would actually turn out as dystopia — aka hell on earth!
]]>What you don’t address, however — and who could at this point — is what comes next? If Perry-Palin (or the equivalent) win, there will certainly be worldwide economic collapse which makes the Great Depression look like pat-a-cake. But then what?
The questions are, (a) what happens to the sovereign political systems of America and the rest of the developed world. My guess — oh, you don’t wanna hear. And (b) who wins internationally, which is easy — China becomes the world’s next sole super power, except for the two now economically-decimated nations still with enough nuclear weapons to destroy the planet. (Actually, Russia is a wild card.)
]]>ronpaul dot com
]]>