Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property DUP_PRO_Global_Entity::$notices is deprecated in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php on line 244

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php:244) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/bluehost-wordpress-plugin/vendor/newfold-labs/wp-module-ecommerce/includes/ECommerce.php on line 197

Notice: Function wp_enqueue_script was called incorrectly. Scripts and styles should not be registered or enqueued until the wp_enqueue_scripts, admin_enqueue_scripts, or login_enqueue_scripts hooks. This notice was triggered by the nfd_wpnavbar_setting handle. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.3.0.) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6078

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php:244) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-includes/feed-rss2.php on line 8
Blunt Archives - Occasional Planet https://occasionalplanet.org/tag/blunt/ Progressive Voices Speaking Out Sat, 15 Jul 2017 17:33:52 +0000 en-US hourly 1 211547205 What’s the matter with Missouri: 2017 edition https://occasionalplanet.org/2017/07/15/whats-matter-missouri-2017-edition/ https://occasionalplanet.org/2017/07/15/whats-matter-missouri-2017-edition/#respond Sat, 15 Jul 2017 17:17:35 +0000 http://occasionalplanet.org/?p=37352 The blood-red Missouri legislature, the state’s once-Democrat-now-Republican Governor, and our party-uber-alles senior Senator continue to make this state a beacon for everything that’s going

The post What’s the matter with Missouri: 2017 edition appeared first on Occasional Planet.

]]>

The blood-red Missouri legislature, the state’s once-Democrat-now-Republican Governor, and our party-uber-alles senior Senator continue to make this state a beacon for everything that’s going wrong in our country today. It’s not hard to find examples. Here are just a few:

  • Missouri’s first-term Republican Governor, Eric Greitens [of assault-weapon ad fame], has signed a bill that revokes the City of St. Louis’ minimum wage hike. So, as of August 28, workers in the City of St. Louis who were earning $10/hr. under the new minimum wage, will get a pay cut, back to the old minimum wage of $7.70/hr.
  • Missouri Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft [yes, he is the son of former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft] is one of only three Secretaries of State in the U.S., who have unconditionally surrendered vast amounts of voters’ personal information to Donald Trump and Chris Kobach’s election-suppression commission. No questions asked. Just handed it over because his Republican president asked for it.
  • Republican U.S. Senator Roy Blunt unequivocally supports the McConnell/Trump replacement for the Affordable Care Act. Well, Missouri never expanded Medicaid anyway, so what’s the big deal, right?
  • REAL ID is still a real problem in Missouri, because the legislature took 12 years to finally pass it. The 2017 legislature passed a bill that would bring state IDs into compliance, without which people using Missouri-issued IDs would be barred by TSA from flying. [Some ultra-conservative legislators held out for “privacy rights” by including a clause that allows people to opt out and just keep their old, non-compliant IDs.] But Missouri is about to run out of free passes from the federal government, and there’s still no plan to help people get the proper ID. But, y’know, why would anyone want to leave Missouri [or try to enter a federal building] anyway?
  • Just yesterday, I attended a meeting at which lawyers were explaining the rights of surviving spouses under Missouri law. Here’s how the statute begins:

…The surviving spouse [is] entitled to the following property of the estate without regard to its value: The family bible and other books, one automobile or other passenger vehicle, including a pickup truck, with its means of propulsion…

If the order in which things are listed is indicative, the most important possession is the family bible. Next in order of priority is the car or pickup truck, and the dead spouse can’t screw the surviving spouse by having had the engine removed. These are apparently the laughable priorities in Missouri law…

  • Missouri has some of the most lax gun laws in America. The legislature has decided that anyone can carry a concealed weapon almost anywhere in the state without the need to get a permit or training. Missouri also has the distinction of being the first state to adopt a “Stand Your Ground”  [otherwise known as “shoot first”] law since Trayvon Martin was killed in 2012. Naturally, that puts Missouri out of step with the rest of the country, where an American Bar Association task force and numerous other state legislatures have urged states to rethink such laws.
  • Governor Greitens, again: He is rapidly earning a reputation for being a “mini-Trump,” with no experience in government and grandiose ambitions [He has amassed a huge campaign war chest, and is clearly aiming for a presidential run in 2020.]  Last week, he boasted that he was going to go on a rampage against crime in St. Louis by putting the Missouri Highway Patrol out on the interstates in force, looking for bad guys. After deploying the Highway Patrol for the weekend, he further bragged that they had made “dozens of  felony arrests.”  Statistics revealed than the Patrol had made only one arrest.
  • While some people are describing the Trump administration as a “dumpster fire,” Missouri is home to the mother of all dumpster conflagrations—the one in St. Louis, where an underground fire in the Bridgeton Landfill is creeping ever closer to radioactive waste dumped nearby during the 1970s and 1980s. No one actually knows when the two will merge, and no one actually knows what will happen when the confluence takes place. Wait, it’s worse: No one knows if it has actually already happened.

And these are only the items that popped into my head over a period of about 15 minutes. It’s hard being a blue person in a red state. The only consolation is that things might be even worse in our once- proudly-blue-state neighbor, now turned fiscal laughingstock—Illinois.

The post What’s the matter with Missouri: 2017 edition appeared first on Occasional Planet.

]]>
https://occasionalplanet.org/2017/07/15/whats-matter-missouri-2017-edition/feed/ 0 37352
A MO Democratic candidate calls for a Balanced Budget amendment. Wait, what? https://occasionalplanet.org/2016/06/27/mo-democratic-candidate-calls-balanced-budget-amendment-wait/ https://occasionalplanet.org/2016/06/27/mo-democratic-candidate-calls-balanced-budget-amendment-wait/#comments Tue, 28 Jun 2016 01:46:27 +0000 http://www.occasionalplanet.org/?p=34272 In a shocking policy statement released last week, Democrat Jason Kander—who is running for US Senate to unseat Republican incumbent Roy Blunt—announced that he

The post A MO Democratic candidate calls for a Balanced Budget amendment. Wait, what? appeared first on Occasional Planet.

]]>

Jason Kander
Jason Kander

In a shocking policy statement released last week, Democrat Jason Kander—who is running for US Senate to unseat Republican incumbent Roy Blunt—announced that he supports a Balanced Budget amendment to the US Constitution.

That is a very odd policy position for a Democrat. Usually, this balanced-budget stuff is the bailiwick of Republicans, who claim that it’s a more responsible way to run government. Democrats usually oppose this kind of policy. Here are some of the reasons behind their opposition, from a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution:

 

  • Budget deficits are sometimes beneficial, not just in times of war but also during economic slowdowns.

  • A balanced-budget amendment brings the threat of political extortion by a congressional minority. Requiring a super-majority to run a deficit “is a veritable summons to political extortion by an intransigent minority” and could trigger a constitutional crisis.

  • It is unwise to lock into the Constitution an economic variable of limiting government spending to 18 or 20 percent of economic output, since that level may need to change based on facts and circumstances.

And conventional [Democratic] wisdom says that the whole notion of a balanced budget is just a code-word, cover-story for making sure that, when the budget has to be balanced, cuts will come from social programs and the safety net, not from military spending, or from tax advantages for the wealthiest.

So, what is Kander thinking here?

Maybe he thinks that supporting the balanced budget concept will co-opt Blunt, who has co-sponsored such a measure many times during his tenure in Washington DC. In this line of thinking, Kander’s support for the amendment “takes the issue off the table” in the campaign. He has said that a national constitutional amendment would merely take its cue from similar balanced-budget measures in many states.  [Yeah, but what if balanced state budgets are a bad idea, too? Not a very good example. The federal government should be smarter than the states.]

Or maybe he thought that his supporters wouldn’t notice. It’s sort of an obscure issue, after all, and probably not top-of-mind for most people. But if that’s the case, why send out a tweet about it? Why make it an issue at all?  Why not do what most real Democrats do, and oppose it.

Sorry, Jason. I liked you as Missouri Secretary of State. And I was just about to sign up to volunteer for your campaign, on the recommendation of a friend whose opinion I value. But now that you’ve announced this policy, I’m less likely to help you out. This is exactly the kind of stinkin’ thinkin’ that other Missouri Democrats have engaged in as a ploy to appeal to Republican voters. Prime example: Robin Carnahan, another former MO Secretary of State tilted rightward in a previous election, sullying her previously stellar reputation, alienating many supporters, and failing to swing any Republican voters her way, and, of course, ultimately losing the election.]

When will these cowardly Democrats learn? In Missouri, you’re not going to grab any Republican voters by pretending to support conservative ideas. If they want a Republican, they’re going to vote for one. You’re not fooling them.  You can’t out-Republican Missouri Republicans. But what you are doing is alienating Democrats.

What we need are not Republican-light Democrats. We need progressive Democrats—Democrats who are not afraid to work for liberal policies. When Democrats pull this fake conservative bullshit, what they take off the table is the progressive message.  And that is really sad, because a lot of people may call themselves conservative, but expect to receive the services brought to them by progressive ideas [Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, TANF, fully funded police and fire services, infrastructure—to name just a few.] They just don’t realize it. They should be reminded. That’s a really important job for Democrats. And that’s why I have zero patience for Democrats who support terrible, right-wing policies like a balanced- budget amendment.

I await an explanation from Kander.

The post A MO Democratic candidate calls for a Balanced Budget amendment. Wait, what? appeared first on Occasional Planet.

]]>
https://occasionalplanet.org/2016/06/27/mo-democratic-candidate-calls-balanced-budget-amendment-wait/feed/ 1 34272
Gun crazy: Senator Roy Blunt edition https://occasionalplanet.org/2016/06/27/gun-crazy-missouri-edition/ https://occasionalplanet.org/2016/06/27/gun-crazy-missouri-edition/#respond Mon, 27 Jun 2016 22:21:40 +0000 http://www.occasionalplanet.org/?p=34266 We’ve all heard the tragic stories about parents who just look away for one distracted second while disaster strikes their helpless toddler. There’s the

The post Gun crazy: Senator Roy Blunt edition appeared first on Occasional Planet.

]]>

roy blunt nraWe’ve all heard the tragic stories about parents who just look away for one distracted second while disaster strikes their helpless toddler. There’s the kid who got into the gorilla enclosure at the Cincinnati zoo, or the children in Texas who drowned while their mother was occupied with her cell phone. When I think about the damage that is being done to our society by the latest evolution of our gun culture, I can sympathize with those parents.

I’m not a gun aficionado, but, for a long time, I felt that settling the 2nd amendment questions about gun ownership weren’t my first priority when it came to political activism – at least not in a society where we have had to fight every day to defend the economic and social progress we made in the 20th century. Social Security, reproductive rights, civil rights for minorities – all came before guns.

Guns, after all, just didn’t seem like that big a deal. When I was a child and we were living in a rural area, my father owned an old shot gun that was kept, unloaded, in the back of a closet. It was only used once that I know of, to stop the suffering of a pet dog that had been too badly badly mauled by coyotes to survive. Later, when we moved to a small city, few, if any, of our urban neighbors had guns, or, if they did, they were securely locked away and nobody thought much about them. So who cared if a few nuts were hot and bothered by the 2nd Amendment? Like those distracted parents, I looked away.

When I looked back again the disastrous view took my breath away. There are more than 300 million guns in circulation – in a country of 300 million people – although only about a third subscribe to gun ownership. In 2015 there were 372 mass shootings (i.e., four or more individuals shot) , which killed 475 people and wounded 1,870. Overall, excluding suicide, 13,286 people were killed in the US by firearms in 2015, and 26,819 people were injured.

And make no mistake, this is an American phenomenon. In the U.S. 60% of all murders in 2015 were the result of gun violence, while only 31% of the murders in Canada, 18.2% in Australia, and just 10% in the UK were attributable to guns. I should add that Canada, Australia and the UK all have strict gun regulations.

Concomitant with America’s gun blood-bath is the rise of what Evan Osnos, a writer for the New Yorker, calls the rise of a “concealed-carry lifestyle” that leaves me shaking in my (metaphorical) boots:

“Something really profound has changed in the way that we use guns,” Osnos tells Fresh Air‘s Terry Gross. “Concealed carry, as it’s known, is now legal in all 50 states.”

Osnos, who writes about the evolution of concealed carry in the current issue of The New Yorker, estimates that there are about 13 million people who are licensed to carry a concealed gun in the United States — more than 12 times the number of police officers and detectives in America.

He says that gun manufacturers market a “concealed-carry lifestyle,” which uses fear to sell guns.

“If you are somebody who is considering buying a gun, or you’ve become part of this phenomenon of carrying a gun in daily life, you are constantly being reminded of ways in which you could encounter a threat,” he says.

This means that anyone in my neighborhood could be packing at any time. Couple this fact with a Missouri law awaiting the Governor’s signature that would extend stand-your-ground, and any paranoid lout or half-drunk old geezer who is offended by the way I allegedly looked at him, by an overheard conversation, by the political signs in my front yard, or just about anything that strikes his or her fevered imagination as threatening, can be inspired to fire off a few rounds in my direction. The possibilities opened up by concealed carry and stand-your-ground laws do not make me feel safe. They make me instead think about getting out of Dodge.

In his New Yorker article, Osnos describes how, in the interest of increased sales, the NRA uses racially-tinged fear of crime and populist fears that “powerful Americans are seeking to disarm and endanger less privileged citizens” to whip up the paranoia that fuels gun fervor. And to support this union of fear and guns, the NRA regularly pays off pet politicians. Politicians like Missouri’s Senator Roy Blunt:

Since 1998, no current member of Congress has accepted more in campaign donations from the National Rifle Association than Missouri Sen. Roy Blunt. A new analysis this week from The Washington Post, and highlighted in the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, showed that Blunt has received $60,550 from the NRA.

Go ahead. Guess where Blunt has come down on all the recent efforts to keep military assault weapons out of the hands of civilians – including suspected terrorists.

To be fair, Blunt did vote for two GOP-sponsored amendments that pretended to keep suspected terrorists from buying guns while doing nothing or even, according to some calculations, making the gun situation worse. Nothing like pretend government. Maybe Missourians should all just pretend to vote for Blunt next November.

[Editor’s note: Missouri Governor Jay Nixon has vetoed the 2016 bill that would have enabled concealed-carry without a permit. Republicans, of course, are threatening to override that veto.]

The post Gun crazy: Senator Roy Blunt edition appeared first on Occasional Planet.

]]>
https://occasionalplanet.org/2016/06/27/gun-crazy-missouri-edition/feed/ 0 34266
Trump candidacy threatens MO’s Blunt https://occasionalplanet.org/2016/05/11/must-not-named-trump/ https://occasionalplanet.org/2016/05/11/must-not-named-trump/#comments Wed, 11 May 2016 15:13:23 +0000 http://www.occasionalplanet.org/?p=34074 Wanna know how lots of GOP politicians feel about their 2016 presidential candidate, Donald Trump? That’s easy. He scares the bejesus out of ’em.

The post Trump candidacy threatens MO’s Blunt appeared first on Occasional Planet.

]]>

blunt
Missouri Senator Roy Blunt (R)

Wanna know how lots of GOP politicians feel about their 2016 presidential candidate, Donald Trump? That’s easy. He scares the bejesus out of ’em.

How can one tell? As Slate‘s Jim Newell observes, many GOPers won’t even utter his name. Instead, he’s “the nominee,” as in “I support the nominee.” Alternatively, for those looking for even more degrees of separation, he becomes the “ticket,” which as loyal Republican foot soldiers, they’ll support.

Since there are many Republicans who view Trump’s ascendancy as the death of the Republican Party as we know it, this must the denial stage of grieving.

Missouri’s own Roy Blunt is still willing to refer to Trump by name, but he’s signaling that he’s not happy about owning up to being a member of the same club, asserting that, “Sometime in the next 24 hours I may do a total moratorium on any Trump questions in this building and just refer you to the office who knows how many times I’ve already answered the Trump questions.”

I guess he hasn’t made it to the second stage of grieving, but is lingering over the first: anger.

And well he might. Today no less a source than the Washington Post indicated that Blunt was looking more and more vulnerable to the attacks of his Challenger, Missouri’s Democratic Secretary of State, Jason Kander. This must be a new sensation for Blunt. As a campaign surrogate noted, “in a normal election year, he would be untouchable […]. But given the volatility and the uncertainty, he’s aware he can’t take anything for granted.”Clearly, by “volatility” and “uncertainty,” Blunt’s mouthpiece means Donald Trump, but, of course, that name cannot be uttered by the more faint-of-heart GOPers.

Blunt may be a little angry about what The Donald is doing to his campaign, but he’s not above some bluster:

Blunt himself pointed to the 2012 result in Missouri — when senior senator Claire McCaskill, a Democrat, won by 15 points as Romney cruised — as evidence that his fate won’t be tied to Trump’s.

But Claire McCaskill was running against the boneheaded Todd Akin. And Jason Kander is no Todd Akin.

The post Trump candidacy threatens MO’s Blunt appeared first on Occasional Planet.

]]>
https://occasionalplanet.org/2016/05/11/must-not-named-trump/feed/ 3 34074