A short foray back into politics from former President Barack Obama seems to indicate that he is entrenched in the old monied interests of the Democratic Party and about as far away as possible from a new Blue Wave characterized by newcomers such as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. As the party needs to connect with more young people and others who have been disaffected, he chose to chastise Democrats for moping too much.

“If you are one of these folks who is watching cable news at your cocktail parties with your friends and you are saying ‘civilization is collapsing’ and you are nervous and worried, but that is not where you are putting all your time, energy and money, then either you don’t actually think civilization is collapsing … or you are not pushing yourself hard enough and I would push harder.”

The problem is, he said this and more at a cocktail party, a fund-raiser in Beverly Hills. He said it with 200 donors in attendance where the evening was “highlighted” by a performance by Christina Aguilera.

Two clear problems. First, there is way too much money in politics and Obama is just reinforcing that. It might do him well to remember that Ocasio-Cortez’s victory came over an entrenched incumbent who spent ten times as much money as she did. More and more Democrats are realizing that can be a turn-off.

That leads to the second point. The voters that Democrats need are not the ones who can go to fund-raisers, and in many ways, fund-raisers are the last place they would want to be.

It is indeed ironic how Obama came to power on a wave largely propelled by inexpensive social media. He carried with him a reputation as a “man of the people” who before he was knocking on doors for votes was knocking on doors to ask people what he could do for them and their community. That’s what community organizers do and it’s also how politicians connect with the electorate. How many of the people at the Beverly Hills shindig live in homes where anyone can get to the door and knock?

Imagine what it would do to the actual and potential Democratic electorate if Obama was going door-to-door with the likes of Ocasio-Cortez and other young progressive candidates who were not relying on money from big donors to propel them into power?

Imagine if he spent one or two days a month knocking on doors in the projects of Chicago and elsewhere to learn of their current concerns and to offer to use his skills as an attorney to help them have their rights properly recognized and respected?

The former president is spending much of his current time working on a book about his White House years. It might help him put his actions and inactions in a better perspective if he spent more time asking questions of the people who are most impacted by government action rather than those who survive no matter what.

Nothing could be more helpful to the Democratic Party and the nation than a freshly energized Barack Obama who combined his experience and wisdom with the dream and hopes that remain with his constituency. The fund-raisers deepen the coffers of fat-cats. If they mope because he doesn’t pander to them, so be it. What is needed is to get grass-roots voters out of their funk and into action.

The post Obama’s “tough love” sounds very tone deaf appeared first on Occasional Planet.

For a while, it seemed to be a shoo-in for Hillary as the Donald kept putting one foot after the other in his mouth, as if he was an octopus. But now he’s seemingly been tamed, and there is more of a need to promote Hillary Clinton on her own merits.

This past weekend was somewhat of a downer. The question of Clinton’s accessibility to the press resurfaced, and the very reasonable Brian Stelter of CNN informed us that it has been 260 days and counting since her last press conference. To make it worse, she was spending the days hopping from one exclusive fund-raising event to another.

This makes it harder for some to accept her as being “authentic.” After all, how many “real people” do you know who go to fund-raisers … for themselves? I would put going to one of these events somewhere above a colonoscopy, but still much worse than a trip to the modern-day dentist.

I wonder if she and her advisors are making a cost-benefit analysis of these fund-raisers. The plus side is that she raises money which can be spent on television ads, which to date have been very good. The down side is the perception that she is most at home with other “insiders” and she is distancing herself further from the preponderance of voters.

I would love for her to hold a full-fledged press conference, but I can understand her reluctance to do so. There are sharks out there who consider her fresh meat every time that she steps on a stage. But there are ways to be accessible to the press without holding a conference.

In the past, she has been quite willing to go on PBS and be interviewed by Gwen Ifill or Judy Woodruff. Both of them are fair, while still willing to challenge their subjects. Rachel Maddow or Lawrence O’Donnell on MSNBC will always give her a fair shake as will Erin Burnett or Don Lemon on CNN.

She could go on Face the Nation with John Dickerson who moderates the program with the same dignity as his predecessor, Bob Schieffer. She could do ABC’s “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos, after all he was working for the Clintons shortly after he was out of diapers.

Gloria Shur Bilchik pointed out last week that the Clinton campaign does not seem serious in a state like Missouri which is now considered pink rather than red. Think of the visibility she could gain if she did nothing more than put together an organization that would harness the energy of all the volunteers who would like to work for her. There is nothing wrong with a 50-state strategy. In this strange election year, outcomes could be very unpredictable. At the very least, she can help spread her “progressive-lite” message to millions of voters who otherwise would not be likely to hear it.

I know that all of this will seem meaningless after the debates begin come September 26. But what she is doing now is shaping the predisposition that voters will bring towards her in the first debate.

As she languishes, more and more of her potential voters give consideration to Libertarian Gary Johnson or Green Party candidate Jill Stein. The “fierce urgency of now” exists for Clinton. As the Donald is somewhat muzzled, there are more headlines to be grabbed each day. I hope that she comes out of the shell and gives her supporters more to work with. There is untapped energy out there for her, but it is in dwindling supply and it has a short half-life. Come on Hillary, help us help you.

The post Hillary, I’m trying to help. Give me something to work with. appeared first on Occasional Planet.