In an era when there’s a database for just about everything, you’d have a hard time finding one that tallies up the total number of children enrolled in kindergarten or pre-K programs in the U.S.  Is that really a problem?

Yes, it is.

Educational research continues to show that access to early-childhood education is a critical factor in children’s readiness for school. Early-learning research has shown that 85 percent of brain development happens before age 5. Clearly, children who have access to early-childhood programs are getting something very beneficial. Those who don’t—and access to these programs is often linked to income—are often forced to play catch-up once they get to school. And let’s face it: our K-12 system is not very good at helping catch-up kids who are very far behind.

The U.S.Census Bureau and child-advocacy organizations regularly publish statistics about early-childhood education. For example, the 2010-211 Yearbook published by the National Institute for Early Education Research [NIEER] says that 28 percent of America’s 4-year-olds are enrolled in a state-funded pre-school. The Children’s Defense Fund says that 14.2 percent of 3-year-olds are enrolled in state-funded pre-k, Head Start, or special education programs,  and that 40.3 percent of 4-year-olds are enrolled in state pre-k, Head Start, or special education programs. But both of these reports include footnotes that explain their own incompleteness. And if you attempt to drill down to state, local and even school-district levels, the information becomes increasingly unreliable.

And if we don’t know how many and which children are—or are not—getting the pluses of early-childhood education, we can’t advocate for policies to overcome the educational inequalities that are exacerbated by unequal access and participation.

Poor data can lead to poor policies, and the implications are serious, say the New America Foundation in a September 2012 report called, “Counting Kids and Tracking Funds in Pre-K and Kindergarten Education.”

City leaders, school board members, superintendents, and elementary school principals often have no idea how many three- and four-year-old children in their districts’ borders are enrolled in publicly funded pre-K programs, let alone whether these children are prepared for kindergarten. State policymakers cannot make sound comparisons between districts or shine light on disparities in access in low-income areas. Nor can they easily determine how many schools in their states offer only a half-day of kindergarten – a critical question as teachers across dozens of states will soon be held accountable for whether their students meet new standards.

Even as pre-K education and kindergarten have gained importance in the educational landscape, federal and state governments, and even local school districts, lack basic information about how many children are enrolled in federally funded early-childhood programs, such as Head Start. The New America foundation’s report explains that our system of early-childhood education is not a system at all. Rather, it’s an incoherent, non-standardized patchwork of local, state and federal programs, with a byzantine, chaotic non-system for funding. What data there is can be difficult to aggregate, because different programs report their information in different ways.

The big picture in this very important education area is that there is no big picture. The report offers several suggestions for getting better data. One would be to encourage the U.S. Census Bureau to improve its on-going American Community Survey questionnaire.

It currently asks whether children in the household attend “nursery school,” “preschool,” or “kindergarten” but does not ask whether that experience is for half or full day, in a publicly funded or private program, or whether parents are paying fees or tuition for these services. Without these data, it is impossible to get a good picture of how many families enroll their children in publicly funded early childhood programs.

To close achievement gaps between economically disadvantaged and advantaged students, policymakers and educators desperately need access to the most basic data on enrollment and public funding for all young children. These data will increase understanding of how public dollars are spent, expose disparities in access to early learning programs, and have the potential to increase educational opportunities for young children. Getting the data right is a critical step toward providing better learning experiences for all young children, laying the groundwork for alignment across the PreK-3rd grade years, and building a strong foundation for their success in school.

And one more suggestion: Don’t fire Big Bird.

The post How many kids are in pre-K and kindergarten in the U.S.? appeared first on Occasional Planet.

Two recent surveys released by the U.S. Census Bureau and the Federal Reserve confirm that family net worth has taken a dramatic downturn in the recent recession. The survey’s findings shine a harsh light on the devastation inflicted by the reckless behavior of the financial industry in its manipulation of the housing market, and also explain why the country and families are struggling to recover.

The U.S. Census Bureau shows Gen X suffered greatest loss

According to the U.S. census report released on June 18, the annual Survey of Income and Program Participation, which takes a detailed look at the financial situation of all Americans, the median net worth decreased for all age groups between 2005 and 2010. (Net worth is the value of assets minus debt.) Those in the Gen X age group , now in who are now in their mid 40s to mid 50s, took the biggest hit in the economic downturn

For households in the 45 to 54 year old range, median net worth declined by $54,881 to $90, 434, or a 38 percent drop from 2005 to 2010, adjusted for 2010 dollars. For the entire population, the median household income declined by 35 percent, or $66, 740. According to Census Bureau economist Alfred Gottschalck, the overall decline in net worth is due to a decline in housing values and stock market losses.

A Federal Reserve survey shows record drop in net worth

Americans suffered a gut-wrenching decline in wealth between 2007 and 2010, according to the Federal Reserve Survey of Consumer Finances released on June 11. The Federal Reserve conducts the Survey of Consumer Finances every three years, so the latest numbers compare family finances in 2007 and 2010. The Fed reported a bigger drop in net worth than the Census Bureau, putting it at 38.8 during the three-year period. According to Fed economists, this was the biggest drop in net worth since 1989, when they began the survey.

According to the Fed survey, the median net worth plunged to $77,300 in 2010 from $126,400 in 2007. The 2010 levels were similar to those in 1992. Like the economists at the Census Bureau, the Fed economists blamed the decline on “a broad collapse in housing prices.”

The post Government reports show dramatic decline in family net worth appeared first on Occasional Planet.