\u201cProfessionalism\u201d has become a mantra for teachers, administrators, university professors, and virtually anyone else who considers him or herself an expert on education.<\/p>\n
U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan thinks the answer to improving education involves greater evaluation of teacher performance.\u00a0 No Child Left Behind measures the professional bona fides<\/em> of a teacher by the test performances of his or her students.\u00a0 University schools of education want teachers to take more professional development classes, something which incidentally fattens college coffers.<\/p>\n What education needs is less professionalism.\u00a0 Why?\u00a0 Because the more \u201cprofessional\u201d teachers become, the more distant they are from their core values as human beings.\u00a0 They also become more formulaic in their practices and rely less on the instincts that are fundamental to establishing interpersonal relationships.<\/p>\n I have had the good fortune to see healthy teaching environments.\u00a0 Not everything works perfectly, but in these environments, the central focus is on benefiting students.\u00a0 Key characteristics of these environments are:<\/p>\n On the contrary, teachers who are expected to instruct six hours a day, coach or advise extra-curricular activities, grade papers, plan for the next day, and do the \u201cmake work\u201d required of them by administrators, are left with no time in their day.\u00a0 They often get stressed, bitter and burned out.<\/p>\n Teachers who are in the classroom half a day and spend the other half doing everything necessary to make the next day\u2019s classes go well do a better job of serving their student\u2019s educational needs, as well as maintaining their own personal balance and sanity.\u00a0 Their evenings are free, like those of most physicians and attorneys.<\/p>\n What I am suggesting is nothing new. In fact, it is old.\u00a0 Until the 1960s, teaching was considered a \u201ccalling,\u201d and those who entered it had a self-defined commitment.\u00a0 Not all were warm and fuzzy or even as knowledgeable in their subject areas as they could have been.\u00a0 However, the system they worked in allowed skilled and bright individuals to flourish as teachers, without sacrificing the personal identity that gave them their initial desire to teach.<\/p>\n Hiring and firing teachers is a perennial issue.\u00a0 These are hard calls to make, and they are not always scientific.\u00a0 Intuition is involved.<\/p>\n What we can do, which didn\u2019t happen prior to the 1960s, is to properly remunerate teachers, provide them with a full range of benefits, and do everything to improve their working conditions.\u00a0 That means that, as a society, we need to allocate much more money for teachers.\u00a0 But we have a ready-made source of financing: \u00a0eliminating the parasitic jobs that enable so-called professionals tell teachers what to do.\u00a0 If those people still want to be in education, there will always be classrooms where they will be needed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u201cProfessionalism\u201d has become a mantra for teachers, administrators, university professors, and virtually anyone else who considers him or herself an expert on education. U.S.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":10746,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[1165,54],"yoast_head":"\n\n