If you had a dollar for every time a campaigning politician said that small businesses create most American jobs, you might have enough money to actually launch a small business. Politicians regularly claim that small businesses create between 60 and 80 percent of new jobs in this country. That particular political-economic axiom has become so entrenched in the national dialogue that it\u2019s rarely challenged. But is the premise correct, are the numbers accurate, and do politicians really believe their own small-business rhetoric?<\/p>\n

To start that discussion, you have to define \u201csmall.\u201d It\u2019s probably fair to say that, when politicians talk about \u201csmall businesses,\u201d they\u2019re hoping to conjure images of the kind of mom-and-pop shops idealized in movies from the 1940s and 50s. [Think of \u201cIt\u2019s a Wonderful Life,\u201d for example.] They would love for us to believe that corner markets, tiny family-run farms and one-or-two person home-office-based startups are the small businesses that they want to protect. Those are feel-good, sympathetic\u2014but cynically created\u2014images that perpetuate the idea that capitalism works for everyone and that government regulation of the \u201clittle guy\u201d is what is killing American jobs.<\/p>\n

Unfortunately, the facts of American economic life add up to a very different bottom line. First, that vaunted, sepia-toned image of small business is a distortion. The government agency charged with guaranteeing loans for \u201csmall\u201d businesses\u2014the inaccurately named Small Business Administration\u2014defines a \u201csmall\u201d business as one with fewer than 500 employees That’s not exactly your average, garage-based tech start up.<\/p>\n

In addition, says economist Jared Bernstein, \u201calthough most companies are small\u2014according to 2008 census data, 61 percent are small businesses with fewer than four workers\u2014more than two-thirds of the American work force is employed by companies with more than 100 workers.\u00a0 You can tweak the definitions, but even if you define small as fewer than 500 people\u2026you still find that half the work force is employed by large businesses.\u201d<\/p>\n

If you redefine \u201csmall,\u201d you get another result. For example, according to a recent article in the Wall Street Journal:<\/a><\/p>\n

The European Union defines small- and medium-size enterprises as those with fewer than 250 employees. Small businesses, a subcategory, have fewer than 50 employees, according to European Commission spokesman Andrea Maresi. Define small businesses that way, and they created 32% of net new U.S. jobs since September 1992, when collection of such data began.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And, according to the Wall Street Journal\u2019s analysis,<\/p>\n

\u201cBeneath the 65% figure cited by the SBA is a lot more job creation and destruction than is immediately evident. Businesses with fewer than 500 employees accounted for about three of four jobs created since 1992, according to a paper from the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis published in April.\u00a0 But many don’t last long. For instance, employers with fewer than four workers have accounted for roughly 5% of all private-sector workers since 1992, but 15% of all job creation and 15% of job destruction in the private sector in that period.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u201cBut don\u2019t small businesses at least fuel job growth,\u201d asks Jared Bernstein<\/a> in a recent New York Times<\/em> Op-Ed. Answering his own question, Bernstein says:<\/p>\n

\u00a0Sort of. It\u2019s not small businesses that matter; but new businesses, which, by definition create new jobs. Real job creation, though, doesn\u2019t kick in until those small businesses survive and grow into larger corporations. In fact, according to path-breaking work by the economist John C. Haltiwanger and his colleagues, once they accounted for outsize contributions by new and young companies, they found \u2018no systemic relationship\u2019 between net job growth and company size.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

So, is all the rhetoric about promoting and protecting small businesses just a giant political hoax?\u00a0 Not completely, if we believe the economists who say that small businesses that evolve into big businesses contribute to job creation. It\u2019s also clear, though, that politicians use \u201csmall\u201d in a calculated, deceptive way to give their words a populist ring. But bottom line, politicians probably aren\u2019t really looking out for the mom-and-pop businesses they pretend to defend, because they don\u2019t get big-buck, Citizens United campaign contributions from those little guys.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

If you had a dollar for every time a campaigning politician said that small businesses create most American jobs, you might have enough money<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":12950,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1136,869,93,45,16],"tags":[555],"yoast_head":"\n