Chicago will be the site<\/a> of both the G8 and NATO summits from May 19-21, 2012. \u00a0President Obama will act as host, and leaders from around the world will be in attendance. Protesters from around the world are also expected<\/a> to attend in huge numbers, with the police already promising mass arrests. The buildup to the event is being led by Mayor Rahm Emmanuel, with pushes for more security funding and bigger fines for protesters, while at the same time cutting the city\u2019s libraries.<\/p>\n The Mayor is pushing to raise the fine for \u201cresisting arrest\u201d to $1,000 (about double the previous level) in anticipation of the conference. A Chicago Business editorial speculates that there is concern about a replay of the 1968 Democratic Convention<\/a>, which is still seen as a black eye for the city. Beefing up the ability of the police force to inflict pain on protesters financially may not be the best way to go about this. \u201cOccupy Wall Street\u201d protests that have been forcefully broken up by police are already resulting in lawsuits<\/a>, with many more still to be filed and years of court battles in the future.<\/p>\n Comparisons to 1968 are particularly apt, given the early stage planning already being made<\/a> by OWS and other protester groups. Coordination appears to be progressing rapidly with cooperation from a number of groups already established. Potential protesters are already speculated to be in the tens of thousands. Chicago OWS is attempting to obtain the appropriate permits and lay other groundwork to facilitate the expected influx of protesters.<\/p>\n The last time Chicago faced protests on this scale, the city gained a reputation of having an abusive police force and an out of touch Mayor (the first Daley) who had no respect for the rule of law. Emmanuel may be moving in the wrong direction through massive purchases of security equipment and toughening the fines for \u201cresisting arrest,\u201da charge frequently abused by police.<\/p>\n Emanuel has requested<\/a> that local businesses cover the cost of security.The mayor has asked for $60 million in emergency funds to cover the cost of security items –meaning that many of the purchases will be on a no-bid basis. The mayor justifies<\/a> the \u201cemergency\u201d expenditures as the only method of meeting the city\u2019s requirements. \u201cOnly Motorola radios can interface with the city\u2019s infrastructure\u201d for instance.<\/p>\n Henry Bayer of AFSCME Council 31 has responded, \u201cIf those people can afford to put up $45 million or $60 million, which is the city\u2019s estimate, why isn\u2019t he out there asking them, `Wouldn\u2019t you be willing to pay a little bit more \u2014 just a fraction of that $60 million \u2014 which could be used to keep the libraries open\u2019 \u201d six days-a-week?\u201d The mayor has recently pushed through a measure closing the city\u2019s libraries one day a week to help resolve financial shortfalls. The mayor had originally pushed for even more stringent actions until pushback from city council members caused him to ease off to the current one day a week closure. The mayor\u2019s office claims he is committed to libraries, but, in fact, when funding was needed, security concerns caused him to look for new sources, while libraries got budget cuts.<\/p>\n