\n<\/strong>Cooler political heads have prevailed in Virginia, where a loyalty oath proposed for the March 6, 2012 Republican presidential primary has been sent to the junk heap. So, what was that all about, anyway?<\/p>\n

This round [we\u2019ll talk about previous attempts later] started in December 2011, when\u2014fearing crossover into their open primary by devilish Democrats\u2014leaders of Virginia\u2019s Republican party thought it would be a good idea to demand loyalty from primary voters. So, they created\u2014and both Virginia\u2019s Republican Central Committee and the Board of Elections approved\u2014the following non-binding statement, which was to be signed by anyone requesting a Republican ballot for the primary:<\/p>\n

\u201cI, the undersigned, pledge that I intend to support the nominee of the Republican Party for president.\u201d<\/p>\n

The plan was to post a notice about the required oath at all polling places and to send it out with all absentee ballots. Anyone who refused to sign the pledge would not be allowed to vote.<\/p>\n

It didn\u2019t fly. Even Virginia\u2019s Republican Governor Bob McDonnell thought it was a bad idea\u2014but not, perhaps, for the most noble of reasons. McDonnell\u2019s objections were mostly political: He called the oath unenforceable and \u201cunappealing at a time when the GOP is trying to win over voters in a state both parties consider a political battleground.\u201d<\/p>\n

Another Virginia politician actually noticed a tinge of politically hypocrisy in the oath. \u201cVirginia\u2019s Republican leadership wants to mandate a loyalty oath when Virginia\u2019s Republican officials are in court fighting the Obamacare mandate?\u201d Virginia state delegate Bob Marshall said in a press release<\/a>. \u201cThis sends the wrong message.\u201d<\/p>\n

Marshall also pointed out that, ironically, the oath would exclude Virginia resident Newt Gingrich from voting in the primary, as he had previously stated that he could not support Ron Paul<\/a> if Paul got the Republican nomination.<\/p>\n

Then, the American Civil Liberties Union jumped in, threatening to sue the GOP unless the oath requirement was rescinded. According to the ACLU<\/a>:<\/p>\n

The ACLU respects the associational rights of political parties to establish their own rules for membership and participation, but this is a primary organized, operated and funded by the government. The government cannot require voters to pledge support for a particular candidate.<\/p>\n

\u2026 The pledge requirement places severe burdens on Republican voters. Some voters who are bona fide Republicans may yet find it impossible to state, in advance, that they will agree to vote for a nominee other than the candidate they support. Voters who do not feel that they can make this promise in good faith will be deterred from exercising their right to vote in the Republican primary. Additionally, some Republican voters who do intend to support the eventual nominee but value the secret ballot may not wish to proclaim their intentions publicly by signing a loyalty oath.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Interestingly, the ACLU also noted that a loyalty oath could be acceptable if a party chose its nominee via state caucuses or a convention.<\/p>\n

In the end, after a last-minute scramble to delete it from absentee-ballot mailings, this year\u2019s oath died.<\/p>\n

But this year\u2019s debacle was not the first time Virginia had attempted to impose a loyalty oath. \u00a0In 1995<\/a>, for example, Virginia\u2019s \u00a0GOP required a pledge to support the party\u2019s eventual nominee in the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors primary race, leading to mayhem at the polls with party officials trying to bar people from voting if they didn\u2019t sign the pledge.<\/p>\n

In the 2000 Virginia GOP presidential primary, voters were required to sign a pledge reading, \u201cI, the undersigned, state that I do not intend to participate in the nomination process of any other party than the Republican Party.\u201d Also, in 2008, Virginia Republicans initially planned to include a loyalty pledge in the presidential primary, but then decided to scrap the idea<\/a> amid fears by some in the party that the requirement might alienate some independent voters from the GOP cause. [Another wrong reason for doing the right thing.]<\/p>\n

The Virginia GOP\u2019s recurring love affair with loyalty oaths is only one contemporary example of this phenomenon. Loyalty oaths have been in and out of vogue since the American Revolution, and both parties have used them. While Sen. Joseph McCarthy\u2019s loyalty rampage in the 1950s was among the most egregious, we need to remember that the idea of forced fealty has a long and ugly history in America. These things have many lives, and they\u2019ll undoubtedly rise from the dead again.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Cooler political heads have prevailed in Virginia, where a loyalty oath proposed for the March 6, 2012 Republican presidential primary has been sent to<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":14291,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[255,16,1253,573],"tags":[1430,1429],"yoast_head":"\n