“Playtime is over”, says David Elkind in his March 26 New York Times Op-ed<\/a>. In a previous post<\/a>, I wished for the return of grade-school recess, which has become an endangered, if not extinct, activity in the world of No Child Left Behind. Elkind’s article advocates for recess as well, but with altered rules that include recess “coaches.” His argument brings me back from my fantasy of the world as it was in my own childhood. Apparently, while I wasn’t paying attention, the world moved on from my rose-colored remembrance of Lomond School in Shaker Heights, Ohio: Kids who play freely during recess in 2010 experience a level of bullying and violence that I knew nothing about. He makes his case well, so I’m reprinting his entire article:<\/p>\n

Recess is no longer child\u2019s play. Schools around the country, concerned about bullying and arguments over the use of the equipment, are increasingly hiring \u201crecess coaches\u201d<\/a> to oversee students\u2019 free time. Playworks, a nonprofit training company that has placed coaches at 170 schools from Boston to Los Angeles, is now expanding thanks to an $18 million grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Critics have suggested that such coaching is yet another example of the over-scheduling and over-programming of our children. And, as someone whose scholarly work has consistently reinforced the idea that young people need unstructured imagination time, I\u2019d probably have been opposed to recess coaches in the past. But childhood has changed so radically in recent years that I think the trend makes sense, at least at some schools and with some students.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Children today are growing up in a world vastly different from the one their parents knew. As the writer Richard Louv has persuasively chronicled<\/a>, our young people are more aware of threats to the global environment than they are of the natural world in their own backyards.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

A Nielsen study last year found that children aged 6 to 11 spent more than 28 hours a week using computers, cellphones, televisions and other electronic devices. A University of Michigan study found that from 1979 to 1999, children on the whole lost 12 hours of free time a week, including eight hours of unstructured play and outdoor activities. One can only assume that the figure has increased over the last decade, as many schools have eliminated recess in favor of more time for academics.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

One consequence of these changes is the disappearance of what child-development experts call \u201cthe culture of childhood.\u201d This culture, which is to be found all over the world, was best documented in its English-language form by the British folklorists Peter and Iona Opie in the 1950s. They cataloged the songs, riddles, jibes and incantations (\u201cstep on a crack, break your mother\u2019s back\u201d) that were passed on by oral tradition. Games like marbles, hopscotch and hide and seek date back hundreds of years. The children of each generation adapted these games to their own circumstances.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Yet this culture has disappeared almost overnight, and not just in America. For example, in the 1970s a Japanese photographer, Keiki Haginoya, undertook what was to be a lifelong project to compile a photo documentary of children\u2019s play on the streets of Tokyo. He gave up the project in 1996, noting that the spontaneous play and laughter that once filled the city\u2019s streets, alleys and vacant lots had utterly vanished.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

For children in past eras, participating in the culture of childhood was a socializing process. They learned to settle their own quarrels, to make and break their own rules, and to respect the rights of others. They learned that friends could be mean as well as kind, and that life was not always fair.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Now that most children no longer participate in this free-form experience \u2014 play dates arranged by parents are no substitute \u2014 their peer socialization has suffered. One tangible result of this lack of socialization is the increase in bullying, teasing and discrimination that we see in all too many of our schools.<\/p>\n

Bullying has always been with us, but it did not become prevalent enough to catch the attention of researchers until the 1970s, just as TV and then computers were moving childhood indoors. It is now recognized as a serious problem in all the advanced countries. The National Education Association estimates that in the United States, 160,000 children miss school every day because they fear attacks or intimidation by other students. Massachusetts is considering anti-bullying legislation.<\/p>\n

While correlation is not necessarily causation, it seems clear that there is a link among the rise of television and computer games, the decline in peer-to-peer socialization and the increase of bullying in our schools. I am not a Luddite \u2014 I think that the way in which computers have made our students much more aware of the everyday lives of children in other countries is wonderful, and that they will revolutionize education as the new, tech-savvy generation of teachers moves into the schools. But we should also recognize what is being lost.<\/p>\n

We have to adapt to childhood as it is today, not as we knew it or would like it to be. The question isn\u2019t whether recess coaches are good or bad \u2014 they seem to be with us to stay \u2014 but whether they help students form the age-old bonds of childhood. To the extent that the coaches focus on play, give children freedom of choice about what they want to do, and stay out of the way as much as possible, they are likely a good influence.<\/p>\n

In any case, recess coaching is a vastly better solution than eliminating recess in favor of more academics. Not only does recess aid personal development, but studies have found that children who are most physically fit tend to score highest on tests of reading, math and science.<\/p>\n

Friedrich Fr\u00f6bel, the inventor of kindergarten, said that children need to \u201clearn the language of things\u201d before they learn the language of words. Today we might paraphrase that axiom to say that children need to learn the real social world before they learn the virtual one.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

“Playtime is over”, says David Elkind in his March 26 New York Times Op-ed. In a previous post, I wished for the return of<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":1533,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[57,2482],"yoast_head":"\n