There is a war going on in this country and it\u2019s not the war between Democrats and Republicans. It\u2019s a war between progressives\u2014those who represent the interests of the poor and middle classes, people like Elizabeth Warren, Dennis Kucinich, Bernie Sanders, and progressive activists\u2014and Democrats and Republicans who feed at the corporate trough (most Democrats and all Republicans).<\/p>\n
Corporate Democrats\u2014like Rep. Steve Israel, Chair of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC)\u2014consistently support corporate candidates over progressive candidates. \u00a0Israel and the DCCC are busy throwing money and resources at reactionary Blue Dog candidates who often vote with Republicans\u2014including Mike McIntyre (NC), Tim Holden (PA), John Barrow (GA), Jim Matheson (UT) Ben Chandler (KY), Nick Lampson (TX), Clark Hall (AR). Rob Wallace (OK), and Leonard Bembry (FL). When they are not doing that they are recruiting Republicans to run as Democrats.<\/p>\n
Progressives shut out of the political arena<\/strong><\/p>\n Progressives who try to compete against corporate Democrats or Republicans are often shut out of the running by lack of money, lack of backing by the DCCC or the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC), or they are shunned when they refuse to go along with the \u201cslash and burn\u201d politics typical of both parties. In 2010, Russ Feingold, the veteran progressive Democrat from Wisconsin, lost his senate seat to Republican Ron Johnson. Feingold was outspent by Johnson, and he also refused help from the DSCC who wanted to run negative campaign ads against his opponent. Feingold ran a principled , progressive campaign and lost.<\/p>\n In 2010, progressive candidate Arthur Lieber<\/a> ran against Tea Party incumbent Rep. Todd Akin (R-MO) and lost. Lieber ran a low-budget, self-funded campaign in Missouri\u2019s Second District. Because the district was heavily Republican, his chances were not good. But what was most striking was the complete lack of interest in his campaign by the Democratic Party of Missouri or the DCCC in Washington. Because Lieber was not an establishment Democrat, the Party and the media ignored him. Instead of working to defeat Akin, for years, the Democratic Party had written off the district. Lieber ran in the Second because no Democrat filed to run, and he felt strongly that voters needed a choice. The Democratic Party, on the other hand, couldn\u2019t have cared less.<\/p>\n Corporate Democrats: A high wire balancing act<\/strong><\/p>\n Among the top 10 contributors to Sen. Patty Murray, (Chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC)) are Boeing, Microsoft and Weyerhaeuser. Among the top 10 for Rep. Wasserman Schultz, (Democratic National Committee Chairwoman), are Boeing, Microsoft and American Crystal Sugar. Corporations give campaign funds to Democrats and Republicans because, in return, they expect policies and legislation that benefit their bottom line. Unlike Republicans, Democrats are expected to vote for the interests of working families and they campaign on the promise to do so. Yet, when Boeing or Weyerhaeuser want something, Murray and Wasserman Schultz have to deliver, because if they don\u2019t, Boeing and Weyerhaeuser will take their money and support elsewhere.<\/p>\n That is the essence of the game in Washington, the balancing act of serving donors while trying to serve constituents. Often, their needs are in conflict. It\u2019s not that Wasserman Schultz and Murray are not interested in their constituents. They both have a good voting record on a lot of issues. The problem is that they are both working within a corrupt political system. They work hard to play the game well and they resent progressives who not only don\u2019t want to play the game, but who want to end the game. For corporate Democrats, playing the game well has additional rewards, including future lucrative jobs in the private sector.<\/p>\n