Deprecated: Creation of dynamic property DUP_PRO_Global_Entity::$notices is deprecated in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php on line 244

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php:244) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/bluehost-wordpress-plugin/vendor/newfold-labs/wp-module-ecommerce/includes/ECommerce.php on line 197

Notice: Function wp_enqueue_script was called incorrectly. Scripts and styles should not be registered or enqueued until the wp_enqueue_scripts, admin_enqueue_scripts, or login_enqueue_scripts hooks. This notice was triggered by the nfd_wpnavbar_setting handle. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 3.3.0.) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6078

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php:244) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php:244) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php:244) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php:244) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php:244) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php:244) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php:244) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-content/plugins/duplicator-pro/classes/entities/class.json.entity.base.php:244) in /home2/imszdrmy/public_html/wp-includes/rest-api/class-wp-rest-server.php on line 1831
{"id":15907,"date":"2012-04-30T07:00:40","date_gmt":"2012-04-30T12:00:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.occasionalplanet.org\/?p=15907"},"modified":"2013-02-16T07:48:46","modified_gmt":"2013-02-16T13:48:46","slug":"republicans-remodeled-2012-primary-rules-worked-sort-of","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/occasionalplanet.org\/2012\/04\/30\/republicans-remodeled-2012-primary-rules-worked-sort-of\/","title":{"rendered":"Republicans’ remodeled 2012 primary rules worked, sort of"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/strong>Mitt Romney may not have liked it, but the new rules the Republican Party put in place for presidential the 2012 election season might have had a positive, pro-democracy effect. \u00a0In 2010, the Republican National Committee (RNC) changed its rules in order to delay the start of voting, to discourage the front-loading of state contests, and to allocate early states\u2019 delegates by proportional representation instead of winner-take-all. Even though the 2012 rules ultimately managed to yield precisely the same result that everyone expected when the whole shebang began\u2014Mitt Romney as the presidential nominee\u2014they still gave primary voters a chance to at least look at other potential nominees\u2014as weak and unsuitable as they were.<\/p>\n

And you have to give at least some grudging credit to the RNC for its recent decision not to go back to the old compressed system full of winner-take-all contests, says Fair Vote, a non-partisan think tank dedicated to election reform.<\/p>\n

The fact that the 2012 contest lasted as long as it did is an affirmation of the value of the changes, but there\u2019s still a long way to go, says Fair Vote.<\/a><\/p>\n

\u2026we would encourage Republicans, as well as Democrats, to consider further improvements that will ensure future nomination contests balance the goals of freedom of choice, maximum participation, and success in nominating a representative candidate.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Fair Vote recently released [March 15, 2012] an analysis of Romney\u2019s delegate total under the 2012 rules<\/a>, comparing<\/p>\n

the existing tally of delegates [in contests through March 13, 2012] to what it would be in two alternative scenarios: if all states used winner-take-all to allocate delegates, and if all states use a proportional method of allocation based on each state\u2019s popular vote.<\/p>\n

Contrary to conventional wisdom, current projected delegate totals for frontrunner Mitt Romney are far closer to what they would have been if every state had used a winner-take-all rule for allocating delegates than if they had used proportional allocation of delegates. Romney’s share of delegates currently is projected at 52.1%. If every state and territory had allocated delegates by winner-take-all, his share of delegates would be just 53.0%.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The report then offers a chart projecting the share of delegates won if all had been allocated by winner-take-all, vs. all delegates allocated by proportional representation. Under a proportional allocation system, Romney would have had 39.3% of the delegates.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

To see a full state-by-state analysis, download this Excel spreadsheet<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Given the imperfections of what occurred in 2012, here\u2019s what Fair Vote would like to see Republicans and Democrats do for the 2016 election cycle:<\/p>\n

\n