Corporations have debunked it, media has ignored it, and conservative politicians have fought it, but in spite of these self-serving efforts at denial, Americans get that global warming is real.<\/p>\n
People used to view climate change as questionable<\/a>, far away from them, or something to worry about in the future. It was a hoax, or it was about polar bears drowning in the Arctic, or flooding of coastal areas in Bangladesh. Certainly, it wasn’t an immediate threat to their community, or the United States. But the past year changed all that.<\/p>\n In 2011, there were 14 weather and climate disasters, each causing $1 billion or more in damages, in total costing approximately $53 billion, along with the tragic loss of 626 lives.\u00a0The disasters included severe drought in Texas and the Great Plains, Hurricane Irene along the eastern seaboard, hundreds of violent storms and tornadoes in the Midwest, and massive floods in the Mississippi River Valley. From January through March 2012, Americans experienced record warm temperatures, with temperatures 6.0 degrees F above the long-term average. In March alone, 15,292 warm temperature records were broken across the United States. Americans began to connect the dots. It was easy to understand, from these violent weather patterns, that global warming is real and getting dangerous.<\/p>\n Recent polling reflects acceptance of climate change<\/strong><\/p>\n In March of this year, the Yale Project on Climate Change Communication<\/a> and the George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication conducted a national survey and found that a large majority had personally experienced an extreme weather event or natural disaster in the past year. Respondents said that the weather in the United States is getting worse and extreme weather in their own area has become more frequent and damaging. Most significantly, a large majority attributed recent extreme weather events to global warming.<\/p>\n Another recent poll was conducted by the National Survey of American Public Opinion on Climate Change (NSAPOCC),<\/a> which is jointly produced by the Gerald Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan and the Muhlenberg College Institute of Public Opinion. The December 2011 survey found 62% of Americans think there is solid evidence that average temperatures on earth have been getting warmer over the past four decades, with only 26% of U.S. residents disagreeing.<\/p>\n What we can do about climate change<\/strong><\/p>\n If all goes well in November, President Obama will be elected to his second term. That\u2019s when we can pressure for the following policies to be embraced by \u00a0his administration and Congress. Now that a majority of Americans understand that global warming is real and a growing threat, it’s time to push to end destructive federal policies that are exacerbating rather than addressing climate change. This is not a comprehensive list, but it’s a start. Some of the following information is compliments of Friends of the Earth:<\/a><\/p>\n This would save taxpayers over $10 billion a year and more than $110 billion over ten years. We need to stop giving out billions of dollars each year to some of the world\u2019s largest and most profitable corporations and the biggest contributors to global warming. Ending these subsidies and using the money to promote clean energy is just common sense<\/p>\n Tar sands oil extraction and production<\/a> emits three times more carbon dioxide than from production of conventional oil. To extract oil from tar sands, companies must destroy fragile forest ecosystems and then use a very energy-intensive refining process to turn that oil into gasoline.\u00a0Tar sands mining and production harm the boreal forest\u2019s fragile ecosystem, waste enormous amounts of water, produces toxic byproducts, and disrupt the lives of indigenous people in the area. Fuel from tar sands represents an increasingly significant portion of the fuel used in cars in the United States.\u00a0Currently, the U.S. is the only market for tar sands oil.<\/p>\n The Keystone XL pipeline<\/a> would transport tar sands sludge to refineries in the Gulf Coast. It would pass over aquifers and native lands. The potential for an accidental spill and environmental degradation is significant. President Obama put off his decision on the pipeline until 2013, but he needs to hear from us that we don\u2019t want it. It\u2019s time to end our dependence on fossil fuels and move toward clean alternative energies such as solar and wind.<\/p>\n Hydraulic fracturing or \u201cfracking,\u201d<\/a> is the practice of extracting natural gas from shale using tremendous amounts of water mixed with toxic chemicals. This relatively new technology is proving to be harmful to people and the environment. Due to the threat of global climate change, natural gas is often promoted as a \u201cbridge fuel\u201d in the transition away from coal and oil towards renewable energy. But, the Council of Scientific Society Presidents\u2014representing 1.4 million scientists from more than 150 scientific disciplines\u2014reported to the Obama administration in May 2010, that fracking has received inadequate scientific analysis and may have greater environmental costs than anticipated. In May of this year, Vermont, acting wisely on behalf of its residents, banned fracking.<\/p>\n\n
\n
\n
\n
\n