It\u2019s the right thing to do. President Obama has made a bold and historic decision for his administration to use its legal authority to allow DREAMers–young new Americans who were brought into the country as kids\u2014to apply to stay in the only home they\u2019ve ever known, without fear of deportation. The new policy, announced on June 15, 2012,\u00a0 will affect about 800,000 young Americans.<\/p>\n
Basics<\/strong><\/p>\n According to the Department of Homeland Security,\u00a0 in order to be eligible for deferred action under the new policy, individuals must<\/a>:<\/p>\n Individuals must also complete a background check and, for those individuals who make a request to USCIS and are not subject to a final order of removal, must be 15 years old or older.<\/p>\n Why do it?<\/strong><\/p>\n It\u2019s a humane and common-sense policy decision, and the rationale is simple: Young people who appreciate America and contribute to America, strengthen it. It\u2019s just not right to punish children who\u2019ve done nothing wrong, just because you don\u2019t like what their parents did. It\u2019s not just about where you were born that makes you American, it\u2019s about how you live your life and what you do in the only country you\u2019ve always loved and called home, too.<\/p>\n Issues raised by this decision<\/strong><\/p>\n Is it a politically motivated decision? To be sure, it has a lot of appeal to Latino voters, a bloc that President Obama needs behind him in his reelection campaign. But to call it a cold, calculated political move isn\u2019t fair. A cold, calculated political move is one that defies a candidate\u2019s previously stated views\u2014a flip-flop, if you will, such as suddenly taking credit for the auto industry bailout when you wrote an op-ed calling for allowing the industry to go bankrupt.<\/p>\n That\u2019s not the case here. President Obama has been consistent in his support for the DREAM Act<\/a>. The problem has been that the Republican-dominated House of Representatives has been equally consistent in obstructing any progress for DREAM legislation.<\/p>\n Does the President\u2019s policy decision go too far? Is he overstepping his executive authority, as those who have obsessively opposed any and all DREAM proposals say? No, say nearly 100 law professors, who submitted a memorandum that says:<\/p>\n The ExecutiveBranch has the authority to grant \u2026 administrative relief to some significant number of DREAM Act beneficiaries, and that it has done so both historically and recently in similar situations. \u00a0In fact, the change is an exercise of prosecutorial discretion that is consistent with the current law and has decades of precedent.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n