<\/strong>Who says voting can\u2019t be entertaining? Here are some of the more unusual ballot measures that will be slowing up the already long-enough lines in the 2012 Presidential election:<\/p>\n Condoms for porn stars<\/strong><\/p>\n Voters in Los Angeles County, California will get a chance to vote on whether actors in porn movies filmed in L.A. County must wear condoms and practice safe sex on camera<\/a>. The Safer Sex in the Adult Film Industry Act<\/a> – also known as Measure B – is a response to ongoing stories about outbreaks of sexually transmitted diseases among workers in one of Southern California’s most lucrative industries.<\/strong><\/p>\n Whose Grand Canyon is it, anyway?<\/strong><\/p>\n In Arizona, state-sovereignty advocates are sponsoring Proposition 120<\/a>, which declares the state\u2019s “sovereign and exclusive authority and jurisdiction over the air, water, public lands, minerals, wildlife and other natural resources within its boundaries.\u201d This idea has prompted Salon to ask if the state is attempting to wrest control of the Grand Canyon from the federal government.<\/p>\n Corps ain\u2019t peeps, at least not around here<\/strong><\/p>\n In Northern California, the city of Arcata is has Proposition H<\/a>, declaring that corporations are not persons. If passed, within the City of Arcata, corporations would not be treated as \u201cnatural persons and are not entitled to the protections granted by the United States Constitution to natural persons.\u201d The stated purpose of this initiative is a long-term goal of changing federal and\/or state law to be consistent with this understanding of corporations.<\/p>\n Don\u2019t be cruel<\/strong><\/p>\n In North Dakota, Measure 5 takes aim at those who inflict harm on cats, dogs or horses. According to WDAZ.com<\/a>, \u201cthe measure provides a possible five-year prison term for extreme cruelty to cats, dogs and horses. It lists beating, poisoning, burning, suffocating and crushing as examples of extreme cruelty. The measure says anyone convicted of felony animal cruelty could be barred from owning a cat, dog or horse for up to five years.\u201d<\/p>\n Change redistricting, um, never mind<\/strong><\/p>\n This should help speed things up in California: a ballot measure that voters can skip over, because it\u2019s original sponsors decided that they don\u2019t actually support it after all. I\u2019ll leave it to a more knowledgeable Daily Kos<\/a> blogger to explain it all for us:<\/p>\n Proposition 40.<\/strong> This one is funny, precisely because it’s so sad. This measure is ultimately an outgrowth of the new redistricting policy we have in California, where a so-called “Citizens’ Redistricting Commission” draws all the lines. When the maps for the new state Senate maps were drafted, Republicans felt that the new map would be much worse for them than the old map\u2026But after the measure made it to the ballot, the Republicans realized that\u2014oops!\u2014the new maps weren’t so bad for them after all, so now they’re declining to campaign for the measure that they themselves put on the ballot. This measure is slightly confusing, however, because a “yes” vote keeps the new maps, while a “no vote” throws them out.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n