During the 2012 presidential campaign in the U.S., it was easy to hyper-focus on our own election issues and to ignore elections in the rest of the world. But even if you wanted to find out how many people voted\u2014and for which parties–in, say, the 2012 Ukraine election–you\u2019d have a hard time getting the details. Now, there\u2019s a site called Election Passport<\/a>, where you can dig deep into the data from 80 countries.<\/p>\n

Launched in August 2013, Election Passport is an online resource offering free access to a rich database of international election results. The site\u2019s goal is to enable researchers and students to engage in high-level analysis of elections on countries for which data are not easily available.<\/p>\n

From Andorra to Zambia, this site provides unusually complete data sets that include votes won by very small parties, independents, and frequently, candidate names that are difficult to locate. As an ongoing project, additional elections will be regularly added.<\/p>\n

For most countries, especially those with elections held using the single-member plurality or block vote systems, the data include candidate names. The data are unusually complete for all countries, including very small parties and independents.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

They\u2019re not kidding about this being a research site, by the way. The data is presented raw, in Excel spreadsheets, whose headings you need to study closely if you want to get a handle on what it all means.<\/p>\n

My own, quick, superficial dip into the website offered up some interesting tidbits. For example, in Ukraine, voters over the years have had the option of casting their ballots not just for the \u201cCommunist Party of Ukraine,” but also for groups known as the \u201cUkrainian Sea Party,\u201d \u201cForward Ukraine, \u201cThe Peasant Party,\u201d and even the \u201cFewer Words! Election Bloc.\u201d\u00a0 [Ah, the Monty-Pythhon-esque joys and variations of the parliamentary system. But I digress.]<\/p>\n

Here’s another example: On the spreadsheet for Malaysia\u2019s 2013 election for its House of Representatives, I found out that of that country\u2019s 13,268,002 registered voters, 11, 257,147 cast ballots. That\u2019s an 80 percent turnout, which puts the U.S. to shame.<\/p>\n

Kudos to the American University political science professor\u2014David Lublin\u2014who created the site. Perhaps it will encourage citizens, students, reporters and researchers to look beyond the U.S. and become more aware of and knowledgeable about the wider world beyond our much-too-chauvinistic borders.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

During the 2012 presidential campaign in the U.S., it was easy to hyper-focus on our own election issues and to ignore elections in the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":25845,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1176,384,573],"tags":[2050,1754],"yoast_head":"\n