Ah, Florida. You\u2019ve got to love the originality of the place. First it comes up with the Stand Your Ground law. Now the state is back in the news with another fun-in-the-sun idea. Yes, it seems at least one legislator in Florida thinks that individuals who injure or kill\u2014and then are acquitted for their crimes based on a Stand Your Ground defense\u2014deserve a bit more love from the state of Florida. To that end, Republican State Representative Matt Gaetz is on a crusade to take some of the \u201csunshine\u201d out of the Sunshine State.<\/p>\n
Let me explain. Sunshine, <\/i>in this context, refers to \u201cregulations that require openness in government. Sunshine laws make meetings, records, votes, deliberations, and other official actions available for public observation, participation, and\/or inspection.\u201d\u00a0 Today all fifty states, the District of Columbia, and the federal government have sunshine laws on the books.<\/p>\n
Apparently, Representative Gaetz either doesn\u2019t know or doesn\u2019t care about the history of his state. He\u2019s out to overturn Florida\u2019s more-than-century-long, proud tradition of enacting open-government laws. Way back in 1909, when sunshine laws were just a twinkle in the eye of other states, Florida passed Chapter 119 of the Florida statutes, called the Public Records Law. In 1967, Florida enacted one of the first sunshine laws in the nation, the Government-in-the-Sunshine law, which became Chapter 286 of the Florida Statutes. And, in 1995, the Florida state legislature passed The Florida Sunshine Law.<\/p>\n
So what happened to encourage Representative Gaetz to fly in the face of tradition?<\/p>\n
(Could it be that Gaetz feels emboldened by the scorched-earth jurisprudence of Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and Alito? Please feel free to answer that question for yourself in the privacy of your own home.)<\/p>\n
What happened was that in June 2012, the Tampa Bay Times had the audacity to do exactly what a free and independent press is supposed to do. The newspaper\u2019s reporters and editors recognized an important story, gathered the facts via public records, and published their findings. Following an investigative piece that looked at over two hundred cases in the then-seven years since the Stand Your Ground law was passed, the newspaper published a piece with the headline \u201cUneven Application, Shocking Outcomes.\u201d The paper\u2019s conclusions, based on statistical analysis, demonstrated the obscenity of Stand Your Ground and showed how deeply the law has subverted the cause of justice.<\/p>\n