<\/a>When a person is arrested for probable cause, a prosecutor convenes a grand jury in order to bring an indictment. But, St. Louis County Prosecutor Robert McCullough used the grand jury not to indict, but to exonerate Darren Wilson, the Ferguson police officer who shot and killed Michael Brown. In doing so, he stood the judicial process on its head.<\/p>\n In\u00a0McCullough\u2019s statement to the press he made sure to\u00a0undermine the\u00a0credibility of witnesses who testified against Wilson. He\u00a0described how they misrepresented the facts, had faulty memories, \u00a0withdrew previous statements, and\/or contradicted themselves in their testimony. Evidently, in an effort to counter these unreliable witnesses,\u00a0McCulloch\u00a0invited Wilson to appear before the grand jury to testify\u00a0in his own defense.\u00a0Shaun King at Daily Kos<\/a> characterized\u00a0Wilson’s testimony:<\/p>\n After a thorough examination of Darren Wilson\u2019s four-hour long open testimony before the grand jury, it\u2019s clear that he was well-prepared to paint the narrative of a cordial, helpless, respectable community servant who shockingly found himself up against the biggest, blackest, strongest, demonic super monster he\u2019s ever seen in his life.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Wilson told\u00a0the same story\u00a0in his interview with George Stephanopoulos on ABC news. His story may be true, yet many\u00a0witnesses tell a different story of the events surrounding Wilson’s killing of Michael Brown. Even the police reports have changed since the time of the shooting. There were enough\u00a0inconsistencies in the grand jury testimony\u00a0that Wilson should have been indicted for something and gone to trial, and McCulloch should have done his job and led the jurors to that conclusion. \u00a0But,\u00a0as Paul Rosenberg says “the fix was in from the moment Darren Wilson shot and killed Michael Brown.”<\/a><\/p>\n Data is sketchy and incomplete, but police shoot scores of unarmed blacks every year, and rarely face significant consequences, so why shouldn\u2019t Wilson get away with murder? Still, at least giving the appearance of justice for all, and requiring Wilson to stand trial hardly seemed too much to ask\u2014unless, of course, you were St. Louis County Prosecutor Bob McCulloch, who defended Wilson and attacked his accusers, the media and social media in a night-time press conference Monday that seemed perfectly timed and perfectly toned to elicit the most angry, unfocused and uncontrolled response possible.<\/p>\n As part of his theatre of openness and impartiality, however, McCulloch included a document dump which may have been intended to be overwhelming, and therefore ignored, but which has already proven sufficient to undermine McCulloch\u2019s ludicrous posture of legal rectitude.<\/p><\/blockquote>\nPaul Rosenberg:\u00a0“Everything the Darren Wilson grand jury got wrong: The lies, errors and mistruths that let Michael Brown’s killer off the hook”<\/h2>\n
Jeffrey Toobin: “How Not to Use a Grand Jury”<\/h2>\n