<\/a>I am frightened, saddened and angered by the war propaganda published in the US media, particularly the New York Times, <\/em>the so-called \u201cpaper of record,\u201d concerning the war in Ukraine. Day after day, the White House, the State Department, and the CIA issue false narratives about Putin, Russia and Ukraine, and the Times<\/em> and other corporate news outlets deliver these lies, unchallenged, to the American people. The Obama administration generates false narratives because the real story is too bloody and unpalatable for a public who lives under the illusion that the United States is a force for good in the world.<\/p>\n

Independent investigative reporter, Robert Parry,<\/a> who broke many of the Iran-Contra stories for the AP and Newsweek<\/em>, weighs in on Washington\u2019s conspiracy theory that Putin instigated the crisis in Ukraine. He provides a complete chronology of events in Ukraine over the past year, which leads to his conclusion that the Obama administration and his neocon appointees at the State Department not only backed\u00a0the coup in Kiev, Ukraine, but also continue to escalate the conflict. Parry turns to an unlikely source, arch warmonger Henry Kissinger, to make his case.<\/p>\n

[T]he key point is that Putin was reacting to the Ukraine crisis, not instigating it. As even former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger explained<\/a> to Der Spiegel<\/em>, \u201cThe annexation of Crimea was not a move toward global conquest. It was not Hitler moving into Czechoslovakia.\u201d<\/p>\n

Kissinger added, \u201cPutin spent tens of billions of dollars on the Winter Olympics in Sochi. The theme of the Olympics was that Russia is a progressive state tied to the West through its culture and, therefore, it presumably wants to be part of it. So it doesn\u2019t make any sense that a week after the close of the Olympics, Putin would take Crimea and start a war over Ukraine.\u201d<\/p>\n

In this case, Kissinger is clearly right. It never made any sense for Putin to provoke the Ukraine crisis. Yet, that became the lie upon which the United States has built its increasingly aggressive policies over the past year, with politicians of all stripes now shouting that America must stand up to the madman Putin and \u201cRussian aggression.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0Why is the Obama administration escalating the conflict in Ukraine?<\/h2>\n

With great clarity, independent foreign policy writer Mike Whitney<\/a> lays bare the reasons for the Obama administration\u2019s policy of aggression toward Putin, Russia and Ukraine. He tells the story of a failing empire wanting to cling to its role as the world\u2019s only superpower. Obama\u2019s \u201cpivot to Asia\u201d is an attempt to rein in China and Russia who\u00a0want out from under the unipolar world of U.S. economic and military hegemony. (My emphasis in boldface.)<\/p>\n

Washington needs a war in Ukraine to achieve its strategic objectives. This point cannot be overstated.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The US wants to push NATO to Russia\u2019s western border. It wants a land bridge to Asia to spread US military bases across the continent.\u00a0It wants to control the pipeline corridors from Russia to Europe to monitor Moscow\u2019s revenues and to\u00a0ensure that gas continues to be denominated in dollars. And<\/strong> it wants a weaker, unstable Russia that is more prone to regime change, fragmentation and, ultimately, foreign control.<\/strong> These objectives cannot be achieved peacefully, indeed, if the fighting stopped tomorrow,\u00a0the sanctions would be lifted shortly after, and the Russian economy would begin to recover. How would that benefit Washington?<\/p>\n

It wouldn\u2019t. It would undermine Washington\u2019s broader plan to integrate China and Russia into the prevailing economic system, the dollar system. Powerbrokers in the US realize that the present system must either expand or collapse. Either China and Russia are brought\u00a0to heel\u00a0and persuaded to accept a subordinate role in the US-led global order, or Washington\u2019s tenure as global hegemon will come to an end.<\/strong><\/p>\n

This is why hostilities in East Ukraine have escalated and will continue to escalate<\/strong>. This is why the U.S. Congress\u00a0approved a bill for tougher sanctions on Russia\u2019s energy sector and lethal aid for Ukraine\u2019s military. This is why Washington has sent military trainers to Ukraine and is preparing to provide\u00a0$3 billion in\u00a0 \u201canti-armor missiles, reconnaissance drones, armored Humvees, and radars that can determine the location of enemy rocket and artillery fire.\u201d All of Washington\u2019s actions are designed with one purpose in mind, to intensify the fighting and escalate the conflict.<\/strong> The heavy losses sustained by Ukraine\u2019s inexperienced army and the terrible suffering of the civilians in Lugansk and Donetsk\u00a0are of no interest to US war-planners. Their job is to make sure that peace is avoided at all cost because peace would derail US plans to pivot to Asia and remain the world\u2019s only superpower. . . .<\/strong><\/p>\n

Non-lethal military aid will inevitably lead to lethal military aid, sophisticated weaponry, no-fly zones, covert assistance, foreign contractors, Special ops, and boots on the ground. We\u2019ve seen it all before. There is no popular opposition to the war in the US, no thriving antiwar movement that can shut down cities, order a general strike or disrupt the status quo. So there\u2019s no way to stop the persistent drive to war. The media and the political class have given Obama, carte blanche<\/em>, the authority to prosecute the conflict as he sees fit.<\/strong> That increases the probability of a broader war by this summer following the spring thaw.<\/p>\n

While the possibility of a nuclear conflagration cannot be excluded, it won\u2019t affect US plans for the near future. No one thinks that Putin will launch a nuclear war to protect the Donbass, so the deterrent value of the weapons is lost.<\/p>\n

And Washington\u00a0isn\u2019t worried about the\u00a0costs either.\u00a0Despite botched military interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and half a dozen other countries around the world; US stocks are still soaring, foreign investment in US Treasuries is at record levels, the US economy is growing at a faster pace than any of its global competitors, and the dollar has risen an eye-watering 13 percent against a basket of foreign currencies since last June. America has paid nothing for decimating vast swathes of the planet and killing more than a million people. Why would they stop now?<\/strong><\/p>\n

They won\u2019t, which is why the fighting in Ukraine is going to escalate. . .<\/strong> .<\/p>\n

There will be a war with Russia because that\u2019s what the political establishment wants. It\u2019s that simple.<\/strong> And while previous provocations failed to lure Putin into the Ukrainian cauldron, this new surge of violence\u2013a spring offensive\u2013is bound to do the trick. Putin is not going to sit on his hands while proxies armed with US weapons and US logistical support pound the Donbass to Fallujah-type rubble.\u00a0<\/strong>He\u2019ll do what any responsible leader would do. He\u2019ll protect his people. That means war.<\/p>\n

Financial warfare, asymmetrical warfare, Forth Generation warfare, space warfare, information warfare, nuclear warfare, laser, chemical, and biological warfare\u2014the US has expanded its arsenal well beyond the\u00a0traditional range of conventional weaponry. The goal, of course, is to preserve the post-1991 world order (The dissolution up of the Soviet Union) and maintain full spectrum dominance.<\/strong> The emergence of a multi-polar world order spearheaded by Moscow poses the greatest single threat to Washington\u2019s plans for continued domination.\u00a0<\/strong> The first significant clash between these two competing worldviews will likely take place sometime this summer in East Ukraine. God help us.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I am frightened, saddened and angered by the war propaganda published in the US media, particularly the New York Times, the so-called \u201cpaper of<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":31393,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1383,128,77,1,265],"tags":[698,2485,2497],"yoast_head":"\n