<\/a>If charity was the answer to our problems, then there would be no homelessness in America, no poverty in general. We would have a much better health care system and school systems that truly met the needs of children and society\u2019s common good. But this is not the way that it is, much to the chagrin of Republicans.<\/p>\n The United States is a charitable nation, and as previously reported in Occasional Planet, Republicans are far more charitable than Democrats<\/a>. But as our recent Occasional Planet public opinion survey shows, the issue is not that Democrats are stingy, rather it is that they see government as the best way to address problems like hunger.<\/p>\n Occasional Planet asked* a random sample of 550 Americans, \u201cIn your opinion, what is the best way to address hunger in America?\u201d<\/p>\n <\/a>Slightly more saw government assistance rather than charity as the preferable way to solve hunger, however nearly six in ten said that both avenues are of equal value. But as we break it down to various demographic or affiliation groups, we find a clear pattern.<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n You can see inside the red ellipse<\/span> that Republicans are almost ten times<\/strong> as likely as Democrats to think that charity alone is the best way to address hunger in America. Inside the blue ellipse<\/span>, we see that Democrats are about 2 \u00bd times as likely as Republicans to think that the best way to address the issue is through government assistance. On all counts, Independents expectedly fall in the middle.<\/p>\n Party affiliation involves a choice. But are demographic factors behind the party affiliations the cause of these differences? First a look at gender:<\/p>\n <\/a>Even without the ellipses, you can see that the differences are negligible. What about race and ethnicity?<\/p>\n