![\"identity-politics-a\"](\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.occasionalplanet.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Identity-Politics-a.jpg\")
<\/a>You have to name it before you can deal with it. That is sound advice often given by psychologists, sociologists, medical doctors, in fact virtually everyone who engages in try to solve problems. Auto mechanics do it and so do baseball pitching coaches.<\/p>\nOne interpretation of what happened electorally in America in 2016 as that too many of us just became sick of \u201cidentity politics.\u201d That means that they turned away from the Democratic Party. For generations, Democrats have been the party of \u201cthe colored, Negros, Blacks, Afro-Americans, African-Americans\u201d as well as \u201cHispanics, Latinos\u201d and other ethnic minorities. Democrats have also been the party of the young and the old, as well as of women.<\/p>\n
But none of these categories describe a large portion of those who voted for Donald Trump for president. Hillary Clinton attached a moniker to some of them, \u201cdeplorables,\u201d but that is neither accurate nor helpful.<\/p>\n
Maybe blue collar workers is a more appropriate term. Others prefer \u201cworking class\u201d because it seems to describe a lot of people who have daily jobs. But there are a lot of people who are salaried rather than working for wages or are also \u201cworking.\u201d<\/p>\n
In order to correctly identify this group, we need one or several terms that meet two criteria: (1) the people being described are comfortable with it, and (2) the people outside of that group know who is being described.<\/p>\n
There never has been a politically correct term for white people. Perhaps one reason for that is that whites still make up a majority of the American people. This seems to entitle whites to be the \u201cwe\u201d and any or all of the others to be \u201cthem.\u201d<\/p>\n
The difficulty in coming up with a clear name for Trump voters (and that certainly is not a homogeneous group) is what makes it so difficult for Democrats to incorporate them into their plans, their strategies, their way of thinking of creating coalitions from identity groups.<\/p>\n
So we are going to suggest two things that Democrats can do now to address the problem:<\/p>\n
- \n
- Begin a process of trying to come up with a name (or names) for the people who felt disenfranchised enough from the Democratic Party to vote for Trump, and<\/li>\n
- Named or unnamed for now, help Democrats include them in their basket of constituent groups. These voters need to be seen as people in need of the services and policies that Democrats bring; not as \u201cother people\u201d who we only view as scapegoats.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
So below is a quick survey of possible names for the \u201cTrump people\u201d who have not been included in the recent panoply of \u201cidentity groups\u201d who are part of the Democratic coalition. By the way, if Democrats can include the Trump voters in their constituencies, then maybe we can reach the ultimate goal of moving beyond identity politics and including all of us as part of \u201cwe.\u201d<\/p>\n
Acceptable \u201cidentity\u201d names for Trump voters:<\/p>\n