In his first weeks in office, Donald Trump has been all about executive orders. He has also talked about going after Federal regulations. But, there are indications he could go much further. Trump may be a big-strokes person, but he has minions to get down in the weeds, and therein is the real danger. We have a complicated Federal system, and there are too many levers that can be pulled the wrong way and without accountability.<\/p>\n
In a recent Washington Post article<\/a>, Fred Barbash cites a remark made by Reince Priebus in a memorandum freezing any new or pending regulations. In his memo, in addition to regulations, Preibus references \u201cguidance documents.\u201d Barbash thinks this is a clue that the Trump administration has discovered the dark matter of government regulation.<\/p>\n Why dark matter? In our universe, ordinary matter, including planets, stars, gases, debris, make up less than five percent of mass-energy. Dark matter and dark energy make up the remaining 95 percent. (Complicated physics stuff, see Wikipedia<\/a>.) Guidance encompasses much of what goes on in the regulatory sphere. Hence, the reference to \u201cdark matter.\u201d<\/p>\n So, what are guidance documents? Barbash explains,<\/p>\n The departments and agencies an administration controls issue edicts variously referred to as \u201cguidance,\u201d \u201cinterpretive rules\u201d and most prominently in recent years, \u201cDear Colleague Letters,\u201d a form of \u201csignificant guidance.\u201d Unlike executive orders and regulations, these don\u2019t pretend to have the force of law. But recipients often treat them as if they do, since to ignore them can lead to a nasty tiff with the United States government that can wind up with a threat to cut off funds or a lawsuit.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n This is pretty wonky stuff, but these seemingly low-level documents can wield a lot of power \u2013 for good or evil. They come in a variety of other flavors as well: \u201cwaivers\u201d of rules, \u201cnon-rule rules,\u201d \u201csubregulatory guidance.\u201d Barbash continues with an example,<\/p>\n The most controversial of these guidance documents in recent years was the joint Justice Department-Department of Education \u201cDear Colleague Letter on Transgender Students,\u201d<\/a> which, after its opening \u201cDear Colleague\u201d salutation, informed school systems, among other things, that they \u201cmust allow transgender students access\u201d to restrooms and lock room facilities \u201cconsistent with their gender identity.\u201d<\/p>\n Described as \u201csignificant guidance\u201d by the departments, failure to adhere to it could result in a loss of federal funding to school systems under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which bar discrimination on the basis of sex. The uproar it produced made it famous and it has been at least temporarily blocked by a U.S. District Court.<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n Barbash explains why guidance letters are necessary,<\/p>\n Think of the vast regulatory apparatus of the United States government as a pyramid.\u00a0At the top are laws, like the Clean Air Act, actually passed by Congress and signed by the president, the way the framers of the Constitution envisioned things.<\/p>\n Since the laws can\u2019t deal with most situations that will arise as agencies try to enforce them, the agencies generate regulations to do so. Regulations are just below laws in the pyramid. But regulations have a long gestation period ranging from months to years during which the public has an opportunity to comment on them.<\/p>\n But regulations can\u2019t deal with most situations that arise either, so the agencies responsible for them use such vehicles as \u201cguidance\u201d documents and Dear Colleague letters to deal with specific situations. Guidance requires no notice or comment period. Guidance documents have been called \u201cnon-rule rules.\u201d<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n