\n

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is, as it states on its Website<\/a>, \u201ca U.S. government agency that makes sure banks, lenders, and other financial companies treat you fairly. \u201d It was an important component of the the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank Act<\/em>), a law designed to protect Americans from the excesses that led to the financial crisis of 2008. To date the Agency has been very effective. In the few years since it was established, it has settled over a million complaints <\/a>and has saved consumers more than 11 billion dollar<\/a>s.<\/p>\n

So what\u2019s not to like? An awful lot if you are part of a financial industry that got used to running wild during the Bush years. As The New York Times<\/em> asserts<\/a>, the CFPB may have been too effective. It has far too much independence for Big Banking\u2019s tastes; it can operate outside the realm of strategically distributed campaign funding and lobbyist blandishment.<\/p>\n

Needless to say, when it comes to the CFPB, Republicans have been more than willing to take up the cudgels on behalf of their patrons<\/a> in the financial sector. And nobody\u2019s been more assiduous<\/a> in going after the CFPB than Missouri\u2019s own Ann Wagner, who, not incidentally, rakes<\/a> in a big part of her considerable campaign war chest from grateful banking types.<\/p>\n

The reason I\u2019m returning to what is now an old and, at this point, oft-told story is simple: Equifax. The Equifax data breach that has exposed at least 148 million consumers to potential ID theft, to be precise. Also the fact that Equifax botched<\/a> its response to its big fail by revealing the breach belatedly, and then offering inadequate follow-up, even, according to some sources, attempting<\/a> to make money off of the disaster.<\/p>\n

But don\u2019t worry. The CFPB is on the case<\/a>:<\/p>\n

In a statement provided to HousingWire, CFPB Senior Spokesperson Sam Gilford said the bureau is already looking into the situation.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe CFPB has authority over the consumer reporting industry, including supervisory and enforcement authority,\u201d Gilford said in the statement.<\/p>\n

\u201cThe CFPB is authorized to take enforcement action against institutions engaged in unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices, or that otherwise violate federal consumer financial laws,\u201d Gilford added. \u201cWe are looking into the data breach and Equifax\u2019s response, but cannot comment further at this time.\u201d<\/p>\n

Additionally, Gilford said the CFPB is looking into the arbitration clause inserted into Equifax\u2019s credit monitoring.<\/p>\n

As\u00a0CNN points out<\/a>, consumers who want to take Equifax up on its offer of free credit monitoring for a year have to waive their right to sue, something that the CFPB<\/a> is currently battling over<\/a> on Capitol Hill.<\/p>\n

\u201cEquifax\u2019s credit monitoring product contains a mandatory arbitration clause that denies people their right to join together to sue the company for wrongdoing,\u201d Gilford said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

True, the New York Attorney General is also launching an investigation, and Congress is promising hearings. I don\u2019t know about you, though, but when it comes to who is more likely to be thorough and transparent, I prefer that the task be at least shared with an agency like the CFPB, whose independence is assured. Unlike some congresspersons I could name, it doesn\u2019t have any favors to repay that might soften the zeal with which it goes after a bad actor.<\/p>\n

The CFPB\u00a0 went after<\/a> Equifax and TransUnion earlier this year for deceiving consumers about the usefulness and cost of credit scores they sell. Given their record to date, I don\u2019t need to add that the CFPB got results; it cost the credit agencies $5.5 million in fines and $17.6 million in restitution paid to consumers. The CFPB\u2019s got a track record when it comes to Equifax and its ilk.<\/p>\n

Of course, it\u2019s the very independence of the CFPB that sticks in Wagner\u2019s craw. It\u2019s what lies behind the usual Republican charges<\/a> of government overreach or, in a more grandiose vein, charges that it is not constitutional to have a government agency with so much power that is funded independently of congress and is led by an executive appointee who cannot be dismissed on the whims of various and sundry elected officials without substantial cause. So far, the courts, our constitutional arbiters, don\u2019t agree<\/a> with Wagner et al<\/em>. when it comes to questions of constitutional overreach. (Do you, too, find \u201cunconstitutional\u201d kind of funny coming from GOP politicians who seem to be purposely blind to the constitutional issues that bedevil their current President?)<\/p>\n

Wagner\u2019s onus against the agency extends to its director. She has been in the forefront<\/a> of trying to drum up an appearance of malfeasance<\/a> on the part of CFPB director Richard Cordray, even going so far as to level poorly substantiated charges of workplace discrimination. Most recently, she and her anti-CFPB cadres have tried to besmirch the record of the CFPB investigation<\/a> into Wells-Fargo\u2019s financial malfeasance.<\/p>\n

But right now, when a truly huge number of Americans are facing the potential of identify theft or worse, and the company responsible for losing their data is acting poorly, do you think Wagner could be prevailed upon to leave the CFPB alone and let it serve the people who need it? I\u2019m not optimistic \u2013 it\u2019s clear that Wagner sees the Trump presidency as a lifeline when it comes to her heretofore ineffectual crusade to re-empower our financial overlords, but maybe, nevertheless, we should ask her to \u201ccan\u201d it? Or else.*<\/p>\n

*Note to Ann Wagner: No, Ann, \u201cor else\u201d is not a threat of anything worse than an election. I know that many of your\u00a0grey-haried constituents<\/a> scare you silly<\/a>, but you don\u2019t need to be worried about anything worse than losing their votes.<\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) is, as it states on its Website, \u201ca U.S. government agency that makes sure banks, lenders, and other<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":645,"featured_media":37850,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[994,202],"tags":[2678,3112,3113,2494],"yoast_head":"\n