Those who favor gun rights and oppose gun control like to divide people into two categories, the \u201cgood guys\u201d and the \u201cbad guys.\u201d Looking at people in such a simplistic way is reflective of the lack of critical thinking that seems to occur more among conservatives rather than progressives. But then again, what I just said might also be simplistic. There is some empirical evidence to support it<\/a>, but we must be careful with where we go when painting with broad strokes.<\/p>\n There are two basic problems with using terms like \u201cgood\u201d and \u201cbad.\u201d First, by only talking in polarities, we tend to eliminate consideration of shades of grey. Second, it\u2019s hard to not use terms like these. They are low-hanging fruit; they are handles that are easy to grab.<\/p>\n We spend much of our political dialogue, or debate, in trying to fashion workable policies. But so long as human beings are needed to administer policy, and to make \u201con-the-fly\u201d judgments and decisions, our best laid plans are susceptible to less than optimal outcomes due to that little problem called human error.<\/p>\n In the world of simplified thinking, there is less likelihood of human error when the people who are carrying out their jobs are \u201cgood\u201d at them rather than \u201cbad.\u201d<\/p>\n This concept really struck a nerve with me last night when I watched a repeat PBS Frontline, \u201cBusiness of Disaster<\/a>,\u201d about disaster relief to victims of major storms such as Hurricane Katrina and Superstorm Sandy.<\/p>\n We are talking about two storms in which damages were close to $100 billion, with a \u2018B.\u2019 That\u2019s huge. And the program illustrated a few points very clearly:<\/p>\n But perhaps most importantly,<\/p>\n So, while gun advocates might say that the \u201cgood guys\u201d with guns need to be further empowered, others might say that we need more \u201cgood guys\u201d to be engaged in public and private decision-making and the implementation of mandates. But here we get to a new list of two problems:<\/p>\n We seem to always come up short. I would submit that the problem is that there just aren\u2019t enough \u201cgood guys and women\u201d among us. If our society was a sports team, we would be in desperate need of rebuilding. It wouldn\u2019t be just a rebuilding year, but at least a rebuilding decade.<\/p>\n Our main problem is that critical thinking is at such a low premium. Somehow, some way, we must try to aggregate those among us who can think critically and who also can empathize to find ways to increase their numbers.<\/p>\n I always think that starts in our schools. When our schools place more focus on critical thinking and empathy, we will then be better at responses to disasters, and a lot more.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Those who favor gun rights and oppose gun control like to divide people into two categories, the \u201cgood guys\u201d and the \u201cbad guys.\u201d Looking<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":38063,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,661,128],"tags":[3145,169,3146],"yoast_head":"\n\n
\n
\n