One of the new Republican Congressional majority\u2019s first moves in January 2011 was a smack-down of the 600,000 residents of Washington DC. \u00a0On the very first day of the 112^{th<\/sup> Congress, the Republican-controlled House revoked DC Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton\u2019s (D-DC) right to vote in the Committee of the Whole\u2014an already essentially ceremonial practice. And so, DC citizens\u2014who vote, pay full federal taxes, and are eligible to serve in the military like all other US citizens\u2014lost their last vestige of representation in Congress.<\/p>\n}

The inherent unfairness of this rule is obvious in a District that pays more federal taxes than 19 states and has more citizens than the entire state of Wyoming. The arguments behind it have proven specious again and again. Speaker of the House John Boehner led the most recent move to deprive DC citizens of a fundamental right, contending that representation is unconstitutional. His position ignores a 1994 Supreme Court ruling that upheld the right of the DC Delegate [and a representative from Puerto Rico] to vote in the Committee of the Whole.<\/p>\n

Time line<\/strong><\/p>\n

DC representation in Congress has had many ups and downs, which parallel the see-saw between party majorities. DC Vote offers a handy timeline<\/a>, chronicling the political football that DC representation has been through the years:<\/p>\n

1871: An elected House of Delegates and a non-voting delegate to Congress are created.<\/p>\n

1874: The territorial government of the District of Columbia, including the non-voting delegate to Congress is abolished. [This status continues for 96 years.]<\/p>\n

1961: 23^{rd<\/sup> Amendment grants DC citizens the right to vote for President<\/p>\n}

1970: \u00a0Congress [Democratic majority] allows the District of Columbia to elect a Delegate to the House of Representatives. Walter Fauntroy is elected in 1971.<\/p>\n

1991: Eleanor Holmes Norton elected<\/p>\n

1993: Rights of the Delegates and the Puerto Rican Resident Commissioner are expanded.[Democratic majority].<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

As of 1993, the DC Delegate was allowed to vote in standing committees, such as the Armed Services and Judiciary Committees, because, \u201ccommittees do not pass final legislation and their actions are not binding on the House of Representatives.\u201d DC Delegate Eleanor Homes Norton successfully argued that, using this logic, she should be allowed to vote in the Committee of the Whole as well.<\/p>\n

In 1994, Republicans filed a lawsuit [Michel v. Anderson<\/em>] challenging Congress\u2019s constitutional authority to allow delegate voting in the Committee of the Whole. A U.S. District Court ruled in favor of the DC Delegate\u2019s right to vote.<\/p>\n

However [and with DC representation, there seems always to be a \u201chowever,\u201d], even that court victory had limitations:<\/p>\n

\u2026 if any measure passed or failed in the Committee of the Whole because of a delegate’s vote, a second vote\u2014excluding the delegates\u2014would be taken. In other words, delegates were permitted to vote only if their votes had no effect on a measure\u2019s ultimate outcome.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Back to the timeline:<\/p>\n

1995: Republicans take control of the House in the 104th Congress\u2014the first change in party control in 40 years, and make major changes to the House rules, including rescinding the right of Delegates to vote in the Committee of the Whole.<\/p>\n

2007: \u00a0A new Democratic majority reinstates the right of Delegates to vote in the Committee of the Whole with House Resolution 78, by a vote of 226-191<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

More recently\u2014most notably in 2010\u2014attempts \u00a0to pass DC voting-rights bills have failed when Republicans attached amendments that would have negated the District\u2019s strict gun-control laws. Another proposed deal called for the quid pro quo<\/em> of adding another Congressional district in Republican-dominated Utah.<\/p>\n

Along the way, politicians have taken some noteworthy and quote-worthy stands regarding DC voting: For example:<\/p>\n

\n
• The late Sen. Ted Kennedy, a supporter of DC voting rights in Congress, once said the reason Republicans won’t support full representation for DC is because “it’s too liberal, too urban, too democratic, and too black.\u201d<\/li>\n
• In a show of support for the city, President Bill Clinton used \u201cTaxation Without Representation\u201d plates<\/a> on the presidential limousine. President George W. Bush had them removed.<\/li>\n
• Republican Party Platform 1976:
  \n“We\u2026support giving the District of Columbia voting representation in the United States Senate and House of Representatives.”<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n

  For now, DC once again remains unrepresented in Congress in any meaningful way, and the longstanding \u201ctaxation without representation\u201d argument rages on. Some DC voting-rights activists<\/a> have proposed a twist on that argument, calling for an end to federal taxation in the District to parallel its citizens\u2019 lack of representation. In the meantime, House Speaker Boehner and Congressional Republicans continue to deny DC citizens representation, while attempting to impose their political preferences on the District by loosening gun laws and pushing school vouchers.<\/p>\n

  Can this injustice resolved?<\/strong><\/p>\n

  DC Vote<\/a> puts it this way:<\/p>\n

  Both Republicans and Democrats agree that all Americans deserve democracy. Opinions from conservative legal experts like Judge Kenneth Starr<\/a> and Professor Viet D. Dinh<\/a> support Congress’ authority under the Constitution to give the District of Columbia voting representation in Congress through simple legislation. Congress does not need to amend the Constitution or make DC a state to give DC a vote in Congress.<\/p>\n

  With voting representation equal to that of other Americans, DC will be better empowered to end congressional interference in local matters, have an equal vote on important national issues and tackle local problems with more resources and greater freedom.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

  One of the new Republican Congressional majority\u2019s first moves in January 2011 was a smack-down of the 600,000 residents of Washington DC. \u00a0On the<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7318,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"nf_dc_page":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[29,573],"tags":[3002,898,2484,900],"yoast_head":"\n