Comments on: Mike Huckabee robo calling–again

By: billmozingo

billmozingo — Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:39:00 +0000

An asshole in sheep’s clothing? Will that pass the censors? Anyway I think he is and not even hiding behind the sheep’s clothing. Some people will do anything for money.

By: billmozingo

billmozingo — Sat, 08 Dec 2012 00:36:00 +0000

This is not the first “religious” leader to leave religion for the more lucrative field of politics. Iowa had one several years ago. PATHETIC.. Gives politics an even worse name!

By: Shenonymous

Shenonymous — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 18:32:00 +0000

In reply to Boots. Oakie doakie

By: Boots

Boots — Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:58:00 +0000

Admin here, we had to delete a few comments for name calling. Please keep comments civil.

By: Mike C

Mike C — Thu, 13 Sep 2012 22:30:00 +0000

Today. Ol’ Huckabee called disguised as a survey to pitch his radio show and a movie! It is supposed to be a 45 second survey, but had three questions. In between the questions, he asked about freedom, if I like his show, or something like that, and asked if I wanted to see his movie. Doesn’t he believe in the laws America has in place to stop people like him from doing illegal stuff?

By: Dnodog2000

Dnodog2000 — Wed, 11 Apr 2012 01:26:00 +0000

Well the Robo calls started here in St Louis too from this Slime Ball Huckabee. What a bunch of flat out Lies! He is a Schill for Fox, The Oil Companies and the Koch’s. What is sad some will fall for this Popaganda.

By: Dawnesta

Dawnesta — Thu, 29 Mar 2012 21:11:00 +0000

I got this call today in Dallas, TX. I was so offended at the false representation of Christian beliefs that I stayed on the line and told the operator how upset I was. The problem is that even though I told her that I did not want to “sign the pledge”, I have no way of knowing if they used my name. The call was so full of lies, that I wouldn’t put it past them to use someone’s name without permission.

By: Shenonymous

Shenonymous — Sat, 01 Oct 2011 16:29:00 +0000

In spite of the challenge to its justification, the concept of the UN is just as relevant today as it was when it was created in 1945. It established international organizations to cooperate on specific matters to achieve peace and security and to prevent conflicts between nations and make future wars impossible.

As formally expressed by 28 nations the original United Nations in a joint declaration, by the time it was ratified, 51 countries signed into membership. Today there are 193. Three countries of the 196 in the world are not members: Kosovo, The Vatican City, and Taiwan.

Being convinced that complete victory over their enemies is essential to defend life, liberty, independence and religious freedom, and to preserve human rights and justice in their own lands as well as in other lands, and that they are now engaged in a common struggle against savage and brutal forces seeking to subjugate the world, Declare:

(1) Each Government pledges itself to employ its full resources, military or economic, against those members of the Tripartite Pact and its adherents with which such government is at war.

(2) Each Government pledges itself to cooperate with the
Governments signatory hereto and not to make a separate armistice or peace with the enemies.

The foregoing declaration may be adhered to by other nations which are, or which may be, rendering material assistance and contributions in the struggle, for victory over Hitlerism.

While Hitlerism is no longer a term in current use, it still represents what is still found in the world today, in North African nations, the Middle East, and Latin and South American countries, the political principles or policies of what was the basis of the Nazi Party from 1933 to 1945 in Germany. It means, in the words of Mohandas Gandhi, “naked, ruthless force reduced to an exact science and worked with scientific precision.”

The United Nations has not outlived its usefulness. It is significant that every country except the three noted above have a seat at the General Assembly to participate in the cooperative effort for all humans to have a life based on the principles of justice, dignity, and well-being. Through its peacekeeping imperative, the forum of the United Nations provides at its very least the opportunity for countries who have disagreements a place to exercise discussion in order to avoid the ultimate solution of war.

For an extended argument “Why the United Nations is Important to Us,” see the site at http://www.icasinc.org/2005/2005s/2005sgca.html

By: Tom Welty

Tom Welty — Mon, 19 Sep 2011 03:52:00 +0000

Thank you for documenting the two calls you received from the Huckabee robo . I also received both calls and had similar responses. I used some of your wording in the UN one in a letter to my representative encouraging him to continue funding for the UN. It is crazy to consider defunding the UN. Keep up the good work.
Tom Welty

By: RJ

RJ — Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:23:00 +0000

Unbelievably, they claim to be a “bipartisan organization”. I wonder how many Democrats they support.